M
Moz
this world your lot ^want IS
DEATH RACE 2000 lol
DEATH RACE 2000 lol
Ah - now I never claimed that - just that I accept I have no right to expect people to get out of my way, particularly if it will inconvenience them, if I want to go faster.crafty1289 said:So nobody on this forum ever drives above 70? No-one? Not even when the motorway's empty?
noodlz said:Just thought I'd better point out....did you mean to say:?pedant said:True I did
Eddie M said:noodlz said:Just thought I'd better point out....did you mean to say:?pedant said:True I did
pendant must be the lamps I'd just ordered previously from srcewfxi, sorry, pedant !!
Moz said:crafty1289
if I get it right , are you refering to motorway lane lane hoggers ?
I agree as I said, I don't agree with deliberately holding people up, i.e. not moving over when this causes no inconvenience, (except as see below), but do bear in mind that when there is some traffic, a perfectly reasonable set of calculations shows that the driver you want to move over could need a gap of nearly 400 yards in the lane to his left to do it safely.crafty1289 said:Ah but ban, my point was that if a car is sticking to the outside lane, with no traffic in the other lanes, and someone wants to go faster, regardless of the speeds of the 2 cars, the slower lane hogger SHOULD move over.
I will do this in roadworks, or when people are ignoring the variable speed limits on the M25 (which are there to improve the traffic flow). I do this just in case there's an unmarked police car, and they can then do the selfish dangerous git for overtaking on the left as well as speeding, and hasten the day he's taken off the roads.Its not up to him to determine the speed of the car behind him, and he should not be putting himself and the other driver in danger by sticking to that lane and forcing a left overtake, which is inevitable from most paperclip salesmen in BMWs.
If it's me, then you can picture me thinking "what a self-righteous berk, trying to make a point like that - he should get a life"Incidentally, if theres me in the inside lane, wanting to overtake a car which is sticking to the middle lane, no other cars about, I make a point of swinging behind the car in the middle and out to the outside lane, going past it, and then swinging back into the inside lane in front of it. You can almost picture them going "he could have overtaken on <<that side, surely" fools.
noodlz said:Eddie M said:noodlz said:Just thought I'd better point out....did you mean to say:?pedant said:True I did
pendant must be the lamps I'd just ordered previously from srcewfxi, sorry, pedant !!
Wanna get flamed, go to screwfxers board
A fair bit of leeway there then !139: Overtake only when it is safe to do so. You should
...
- Stay in your lane if traffic is moving slowly in queues. If the queue on your right is moving more slowly than you are, you may pass on the left
....
242: Do not overtake on the left or move to a lane on your left to overtake. In congested conditions, where adjacent lanes of traffic are moving at similar speeds, traffic in left-hand lanes may sometimes be moving faster than traffic to the right. In these conditions you may keep up with the traffic in your lane even if this means passing traffic in the lane to your right. Do not weave in and out of lanes to overtake.