I suppose there might be a little.Would there be any problem though, of an induced voltage at the second set of lights when the first set are on
Depends on the lights whether it's noticed, I suppose.
I suppose there might be a little.Would there be any problem though, of an induced voltage at the second set of lights when the first set are on
Induced between what and what? As I recently illustrated, with the 'conversion method; of 2-way switch wring, at any one time there will be equal currents going along two of the three conductors 'in opposite directions (and nothing through the third), hence largely 'cancelling' in terms of electromagnetic coupling to anything else.Afterthought - Don't we get induced voltage from three strapper wiring?
Yes, I assumed that you were thinking of flashing LEDs (and sometimes even CFLs). However, as I just wrote, as I see it capacitative coupling between L and S/L (effectively bypassing the switch to a small extent) can occur with any sort of long switch runs - be they '3 strapper' or '2 strapper' 2-way switches or just plum standard 1-way switching.I was just thinking of the LED flashing problem in two-way circuits. .... Is it only in two strapper systems?
He appeared to be asking about the possibility of 'induced voltage' between two (separately switched) separate 'light sub-circuits' being a problem, rathing than a problem in relation to the switching of one of the lights.I thought that was what Rocky was referring to.
Rocky wrote ....I'm confused.
... which seemed to be asking about a possible interaction between two lighting 'sub-circuits' (i.e. each having their own separate switch+light), regardless of how the switching was arranged (1-way, 2-way {'2-stapper' or '3-strapper}), and seemingly nothing to do with voltages induced 'between strappers' in one of the circuits. Have I misunderstand?Would there be any problem though, of an induced voltage at the second set of lights when the first set are on
I don't know. I don't really understand what you are saying - or rather why you are saying it.Rocky wrote .... ... which seemed to be asking about a possible interaction between two lighting 'sub-circuits' (i.e. each having their own separate switch+light), regardless of how the switching was arranged (1-way, 2-way {'2-stapper' or '3-strapper}), and seemingly nothing to do with voltages induced 'between strappers' in one of the circuits. Have I misunderstand?
I'm saying it, because I'm also confused - firstly as to why Rocky was concerned about possible 'coupling' of the two (separate) light circuits and, secondly, why you responded by talking about coupling between strappers (of the same circuit). Rocky didn't actually quote anyone - are we sure to whose post/proposal he was responding?I don't know. I don't really understand what you are saying - or rather why you are saying it.
I'm not sure what Rocky thinks, and why, but I see absolutely no problem with the circuit (which, to be fair, was essentially proposed by BAS before either Kentishman or yourself) - which, after all, is nothing more than two instances of plumb-standard 'traditional' 2-way light switch wiring.Rocky seemed to think there was a problem with the circuit Kentishman and I are proposing. Is there?
I don't think that's right. It's not quite plumb-standard.I see absolutely no problem with the circuit (which, to be fair, was essentially proposed by BAS before either Kentishman or yourself) - which, after all, is nothing more than two instances of plumb-standard 'traditional' 2-way light switch wiring.
I wonder in what sense do you regard it as not being "two instances of plumb-standard 'traditional' 2-way light switch wiring"? You posted ...I don't think that's right. It's not quite plumb-standard.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local