Yeah that tickled me too, I was 24Christ...now I know I'm ancient.
A really old house built when I was 13....
Yeah that tickled me too, I was 24Christ...now I know I'm ancient.
A really old house built when I was 13....
That was around when may last house was built, could not afford the mortgage, so went out to work in Algeria 1980. I was in my 20's then, old houses were built in a rush, and by now likely rewired many times, maybe Rome was not built in a day, but that house was. But 1882 the first edition came out, and through the time we have required more and more safety features, exposed knife switches are no longer used, and also rubber cable, and in 1966 we decided lights needed an earth wire taking to them, so after 1966 the wiring in most homes is still good today, in the 70's central heating was still not always fitted as standard, my house as built did not have central heating, just a single gas fire in centre of the house. But most people had central heating fitted within the first few years. However this means every house in the estate had different central heating, and some of the early systems were fitted by plumbers who did not always follow the rule book.Christ...now I know I'm ancient.
A really old house built when I was 13....
My point was use of plastic pipes or coupling So plumbing work can result in a RCD being required even when nothing electrical has changed, and the regulations not being retrospective does not help.
Any "New" installation will require RCD protection, but what I was talking about was an installation which was complying with regulations in 1979, and why it needs work doing to it today.
An electrician does not need to notify, it is the owner who must ensure any work requiring notifying is notified either by using the LABC route or using an electrician who is a scheme member, a scheme member electrician must notify work which requires notifying. As a result the use of paperwork, adverts, including any sign writing on vehicles which indicates the electrician is a scheme member is illegal if he is not a scheme member. But if he does not have anything which shows NICEIC or NAPIT then the electrician is not breaking any law, however he must issue an installation certificate or minor works as that will be needed to be submitted to the LABC by the owner, not to issue one shows the electrician is fully aware he is doing the work illegally.
It has always eluded me why the LABC does not operate a permit to work system, had they done this, then the electrician could not claim he didn't know the owner had not registered the work, but is seems the registration is really a tax, and nothing more, when I used the LABC route with parents house, the LABC inspector did not even pop his head through the door before issuing the completion certificate, I took the installation certificate to the shire hall and the completion certificate arrived in the post. And when I could not find it on coming to sell the house, told it would take 4 months to get a replacement and would need to pay council for workers time to find it. I would have thought it would have been part of the solicitors search, and they would want copies from the LABC as any copies I have could have been doctored, but clearly not. Had it been any more than a tax, then one would have been able to get copies in the same ways as birth certificates etc.
But the permit to work was verbal only, the LABC inspector looked at out test equipment before we started, and inquired about our qualifications, and once satisfied, he simply said go ahead and submit the installation certificate when finished, no paperwork was issued to say I could work, so had I been using another electrician he would have simply had to have taken my word.
As to what needs notifying varies thought out the UK principalities and nations, the English tend to forget the rules in Wales are not the same, as to third party work, not permitted in Wales, only England, but the registered electrician must be in control, he does not need to do the work himself, or we could have no apprenticeships, he can work with electricians mates, and other workers in his control. So he could have the builder dig and fill a trench for example. Not sure about sole traders they may have different rules, but a company can have many people working on one job, so we have a grey area, some one may work though an agency for a firm, and be covered by the firms scheme membership, but have no record of him actually working for the firm. My son worked as an inspector for one firm, I know he needed to show the firm his C&G 2391, but when he started he had to take over work in progress, and when he left he left other work in progress, and he had no direct contact with the scheme provider, it was the firm who was registered not him personally, not like an MOT inspector where it is the person who is registered. So rather unclear who can do what with larger firms.
Originally there were around 15 scheme providers, who could not pass info between them as to any electricians they had kicked off the scheme, there has to be more than one, as other wise it would be a closed shop, which was made illegal, aimed at Unions, but the schemes are basic the same thing as the Unions, so Unions were stopped from policing who was considered as qualified, and the scheme providers took over instead. If either NICEIC or NAPIT stop doing the work, then it become illegal, so all would need to use LABC.
I'm afraid that I still don't understand. How on earth can the appearance of plastic pipes or couplings in a bathroom make any difference to whether or not SB may be omitted? Furthermore ....My point was use of plastic pipes or coupling ..... So plumbing work can result in a RCD being required even when nothing electrical has changed ....
Why not (even if the plastic pipes/fittings did make a difference)?.... and the regulations not being retrospective does not help.
In my opinion, "omit" - as in 'leave out'- is the wrong word.BS7671:2008 allowed one to omit bonding in the bathroom,
Well, sort of, but it is not really a choice to be made.if a RCD is fitted, so we have either bonding or RCD,
Because it is rendered unnecessary and pointless.often work in a bathroom results in loss of bonding, due to the use of plastic pipes, so due to non electricial work, the electrics are affected.
Sorry, but I still don't get it ..BS7671:2008 allowed one to omit bonding in the bathroom, if a RCD is fitted, so we have either bonding or RCD, often work in a bathroom results in loss of bonding, due to the use of plastic pipes, so due to non electricial work, the electrics are affected.
Not appropriate to remove fuses live even if there is no load on the circuit as there are plenty of other things that can go wrong.pulled the light switch cartridges first- but didnt turn the main power off before pulling them,
I have 2 Wylex fuse boxes in service in my home. Shed and granny annex (used as workshop/store) admittedly probably now with 50% of MCB's rather than fuses. They are not inherantly dangerous but they are 30 to 60 years old.Well i am unsure what to do now
I have had 3 electricians in the house now. The first guy was qualified but wasnt registered and i was going to proceed and get work separately checked. However it turned out he wanted to do everything from start to finish purely in cash, and i am not comfortable with something as big as a new CU purely paid for in cash with no transaction record - i want some sort of invoice/transfer record...or is that being paranoid?
The second guy checked the ancient cable for me, top bloke and i would have hired in a flash, he also thought we would get away without a rewire - but is booked up for months for rewires and CU
The third took one look at our box, pronounced it 'an old wylex and thus dangerous' and said 'we will see what the condition report says but i am expecting a full rewire to be required.
Are the wirelex really that dangerous? I have a spare set of fuse wire in case of it blowing, and know how to do it and if i really do need a rewire i would prefer to leave the project until i have a bit more saved cash, maybe 6 months from now (in the last 12 months i have had new roofline, new boiler, new bathroom and i am short of cash).
But he made it sound as if the wylex boxes are death traps... which i dont understand as every device is seperately fused...dont get me wrong he is the expert but i dont get why he was so different view to the other 2 electricians. I also dont understand how i am still alive after 20 years of such a dangerous box in the house
I have 2 Wylex fuse boxes in service in my home. Shed and granny annex (used as workshop/store) admittedly probably now with 50% of MCB's rather than fuses. They are not inherantly dangerous but they are 30 to 60 years old.
Bear in mind the bakelite material does get brittle with age and I will isolate with the main switch/RCD before pulling a fuse as they have on rare ocassions been known to crack.
And this one has been in use for 40 years with a test every 5 years. Each year the same 'faults: no lables and big gaps round the MCB's
View attachment 276626
I wouldn't suggest filling your existing fusebox with MCB's as the cost is likely to be very much in the same ball park as a whole modern CU.
Speaking as someone who (many moons ago) tried to work on it, I would personally say that Bakelite is pretty brittle even when youngBear in mind the bakelite material does get brittle with age ...
They are no more dangerous today than when they were installed 40/50/60 years ago.Are the wirelex really that dangerous?
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local