I have to admit to being quite staggered by some of the replies from what appears to be experienced engineers on this subject.
I would like to make a couple of observations.
1) The thought that so many of you feel that it is acceptable to site a flue terminal that immediately causes an entrant of fumes into a bedroom in an adjoining property (or any room for that matter) is nothing short of staggering.
I have refused to site any number of boilers where the terminal would satisfy siting dimensions because it was quite clear to me that there would be obvious reentry problems to other rooms, whether in the same house or next door.
Quoting 300mm from windows etc is ludicrous in the extreme in these situations in my opinion and a total cop out by the installing engineers.
In effect you are saying to a neighbour expressing quite reasonable concerns "Tough Luck! You'll just have to put up with fumes in your bedroom from now on"
Quite unbelievable to be honest with you!
2) Whilst being very impressed (yet also baffled) with the assurances and technical workings out from some of the earlier posts about total dilution of Products Of Combustion after working out open space volumes and oxygen levels.
Am I the only one who has taken note of CORGI drawing attention to the number of deaths already caused by the re-entry of fumes from condensing boilers whose terminals were correctly sited according to regs but still allowed re-entry as in this case?
CORGI pointed out that if a condensing boilers gas valve fell out of calibration by even a fraction outside the correct parameters stated by the manufacturer the CO parts per million readings increase by thousands of times.
Our local CORGI guy told me of one that whacked up to 39,000 parts per million before reentering a house and causing a fatality even though the terminal was sited as per recommended clearance guides.
My company probably services somewhere in the region of 20,000 boilers per Annam and are already coming a number of condensing boilers whose CO PPm reading have gone off the scale when the manufacturers Co ratio% parameters are exceeded.
I feel that the original poster has quite reasonable causes for concern regarding the safety of his family and would urge him to take any action that he feels that he can in order to have this boiler isolated until a satisfactory flue option can be implemented.
As for those of you that feel that it is quite acceptable for next doors boiler fumes to drift into others properties because the POC are probably well diluted then quite frankly words fail me!!
I would like to make a couple of observations.
1) The thought that so many of you feel that it is acceptable to site a flue terminal that immediately causes an entrant of fumes into a bedroom in an adjoining property (or any room for that matter) is nothing short of staggering.
I have refused to site any number of boilers where the terminal would satisfy siting dimensions because it was quite clear to me that there would be obvious reentry problems to other rooms, whether in the same house or next door.
Quoting 300mm from windows etc is ludicrous in the extreme in these situations in my opinion and a total cop out by the installing engineers.
In effect you are saying to a neighbour expressing quite reasonable concerns "Tough Luck! You'll just have to put up with fumes in your bedroom from now on"
Quite unbelievable to be honest with you!
2) Whilst being very impressed (yet also baffled) with the assurances and technical workings out from some of the earlier posts about total dilution of Products Of Combustion after working out open space volumes and oxygen levels.
Am I the only one who has taken note of CORGI drawing attention to the number of deaths already caused by the re-entry of fumes from condensing boilers whose terminals were correctly sited according to regs but still allowed re-entry as in this case?
CORGI pointed out that if a condensing boilers gas valve fell out of calibration by even a fraction outside the correct parameters stated by the manufacturer the CO parts per million readings increase by thousands of times.
Our local CORGI guy told me of one that whacked up to 39,000 parts per million before reentering a house and causing a fatality even though the terminal was sited as per recommended clearance guides.
My company probably services somewhere in the region of 20,000 boilers per Annam and are already coming a number of condensing boilers whose CO PPm reading have gone off the scale when the manufacturers Co ratio% parameters are exceeded.
I feel that the original poster has quite reasonable causes for concern regarding the safety of his family and would urge him to take any action that he feels that he can in order to have this boiler isolated until a satisfactory flue option can be implemented.
As for those of you that feel that it is quite acceptable for next doors boiler fumes to drift into others properties because the POC are probably well diluted then quite frankly words fail me!!