- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,393
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
Which data.
See the link I posted.
Which data.
It saysSee the link I posted.
It wasn't about a specific belief, it was about how you arrive at your beliefs?Ok..Discussing the Pope and leaving out Theology Razzler is a bit of a tricky debate to have.How is your musical composition progressing? Where might we see a recital?
No time for anti vax anti covid nonsence...would be akin to readin the Beano for scientific knowledge.If you point blank refuse to watch alternative opinions
I thought you more a "" composition" type of bloke.It wasn't about a specific belief, it was about how you arrive at your beliefs?
If you point blank refuse to watch alternative opinions, how do you arrive at your beliefs?
Musicalcompositionarrangement is progressing nicely thank you. What made you think it was musical composition that I was busy with?
Composition is creating music that hasn't been created before. Sadly, I'm not that creative nor talented in the field of music.
Now, 'arranging' is about taking music that has been created by A N Other and arranging it to be played by a suitable ensemble, or in our case the available ensemble.
'Arranging' can cover a wide range of ability, from arranging simple tunes for the available recorder and percussionists in a junior school, all the way up to a new arrangement of, say, a concerto by a famous composer, but for a different type of ensemble than that for which it was created, e.g Brahm's Requiem as an instrumental version for Concert Band, or Freddie Mercury's Bohemian Rhapsody for an orchestra.
It wasn't about a specific belief, it was about how you arrive at your beliefs?
I think the point has been made.Are we talking religion,Covid or other??The pope is head of a giant Religion/brainwashing exercise/Con/theory....Use which ever word you prefer..Which comment how far back are you referring to?
For the first few minutes, yes. But then it goes on to base suppositions and theories on those events, without explaining the reasoning or links to events.Oh and - watch the video. It is not (a conspiracy) theory; it is about things that are actually happening.
I tend to agree, but you can skip back and check on things. But it is easier with text. Plus you can highlight parts of text and quote it and address it easier than videos.Am I the only one who instinctively distrusts videos for making decisions on things?
As I see it, Videos are harder to itemise and scrutinize than text, so they get overused used by people who aren't willing or able to survive that sort of peer review.
It is important not to see conspiracy where incompetence is an equally good justification. Especially given that we're being regaled by conspiracy nuts, we should be better than them.Perhaps that's the reasoning behind the use of videos?
I do feel free, I also feel free not to. I'm vastly more likely to read it than watch their YouTube stream, but that might just be me.Feel free to read the manifesto of the World Economic Forum nuts.