you havent thought it through.
you are avoiding vaccination for non scientific reasons -either cultural or emotional we dont know
we do know BAMEs dont trust Western governments because of historical testing of medicines on them.
Vaccine booking fiasco
- Thread starter Ihavenojob
- Start date
you havent thought it through.
you are avoiding vaccination for non scientific reasons -either cultural or emotional we dont know
we do know BAMEs dont trust Western governments because of historical testing of medicines on them.
Sponsored Links
If it saves lives yes.
Well done, you've contradicted yourself again...
According to you the future events will be used for 'data' purposes and yet admit that earlier data hasn't been released...
What makes you believe that future data will be released?
We could of course listen to your guru, Lloyd Webber
You do realise what you have just said don't you?
You are giving governments the right to do what they want with your most basic right of life...
And define saving lives...
More will die from treatable illnesses than those who die with covid!
Sponsored Links
What has that got to do with mandatory vaccines/medication.
Well done, you've contradicted yourself again...
According to you the future events will be used for 'data' purposes and yet admit that earlier data hasn't been released...
What makes you believe that future data will be released?
We could of course listen to your guru, Lloyd Webber
No contradiction whatsoever.
When are you going to provide the evidence that the risk from the vaccine is higher than that from Covid.
I presume you must know your risk of catching Covid.
It is how you decided the risk from the vaccine is higher than being ill from Covid.
The vaccine is lowering Covid hospital admissions.
That means more resources can be used for non Covid patients.
But you don't want the vaccine, so you want more people to die from treatable diseases.
Jeez how many times do I have to tell you...
No-one knows the medium/long term effect of any of the jabs, or combinations of the jabs...
Oh and you still haven't answered the question "do tell us, do you believe in forced medication?"
And also, you've gone way beyond being an ignorant ar*ehole...
You are now a rabid jabber who simply can't comprehend that the opposite is true...
But hey, what can we expect from a brexit voter who didn't bother to find out the facts!
But you keep saying you are informed and everybody else are lemmings.
Now you admit your decision is based entirely on irrational fear
We already know that the vaccine reduces hospitalisation, so you are simply wrong.
I've admitted no such thing...
It's just been announced that the pfizer jab has been linked to heart problems...
"On June 25, the FDA added new warnings for both vaccine providers and recipients over cases of heart inflammation from the Pfizer and Modern Covid vaccines. The warnings came after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) met and confirmed a “likely association” between myocarditis and pericarditis and the Pfizer and Moderna jabs, both of which use mRNA"
And we're still only in the early days of experimental mRNA jabs!
But hey you go ahead with your irrational fear if you like...
Oh and yet again you won't answer the question, "do tell us, do you believe in forced medication?"
Why will you not answer that simple question?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,675
- Reaction score
- 2,342
- Country
And go on to say "U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advisory groups, meeting to discuss reported cases of the heart condition after vaccination, found the inflammation in adolescents and young adults is likely linked to the vaccines, but that the benefits of the shots appeared to clearly outweigh the risk."
"Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, deputy director of the CDC's Immunization Safety Office, said in a presentation that data from one of the agency's safety monitoring systems - Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) – suggests a rate of 12.6 cases per million in the three weeks after the second shot in 12- to 39-year-olds."
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,675
- Reaction score
- 2,342
- Country
They were first used in 2017, how long do you want to wait?
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03072-8
Exactly, first we need to have a double blind vaccination for a hundred million or so people, plus another hundred or so control candidates and then wait the rest of their lives. It needs to be hundreds of millions to pick up these incredibly common once in 12.6 million probability possible side effects.
Once everyone is dead then we need to compare those people to a control group who didn't get vaccinated and only then will we have any ability whatsoever to be able to judge if we should have vaccinated everyone in the first place. We can't wait any less in case the vaccine kills everyone at exactly <whatever period of time you choose> +1 day.
Sponsored Links
