You've got something like a 450 set-back of the wall, so the new extension ridge should about 200mm lower, as per the approved drawing, so is there really a problem with the roof height?
In a planning context, it is the set back which is the crucial bit and which planners look for, and this in turn determines the ridge height. Its clear on the drawings and the planners have had the opportunity to study it, and in real terms they know what a 450mm set back will achieve. Fundamentally though, they have approved the drawings based on that set back.
BTW, the front canopy is incorrectly drawn on the extension, as the top of the canopy roof will be higher up the extension wall due to it being further back - unless you plan on forming a flat section at the abutment.
In a planning context, it is the set back which is the crucial bit and which planners look for, and this in turn determines the ridge height. Its clear on the drawings and the planners have had the opportunity to study it, and in real terms they know what a 450mm set back will achieve. Fundamentally though, they have approved the drawings based on that set back.
BTW, the front canopy is incorrectly drawn on the extension, as the top of the canopy roof will be higher up the extension wall due to it being further back - unless you plan on forming a flat section at the abutment.