you sure?
America's monthly output of the 155mm artillery shell—highly sought by Kyiv as it continues to fend off Russia's invasion—sits at about 28,000 per month as of October 2023. Bush said during a roundtable discussion with the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) on Monday that the Army is aiming to produce about 60,000 shells per month by October 2024.
Army officials said that the branch is planning on doubling the monthly production of 155mm artillery shells by the end of the year.
www.newsweek.com
Didn't know that, thanks. Assuming that's still current.. Maybe wot I red referred to the other size gun - ex soviet, that most of their arms were. They were refilling the shells at one time, with what they had, which was lower explosive than they russkies. The West weren't making those shells I believe.
Someone said they don't need Himars any more. Why?
It sounds like a battle of the drones.
I've always thought, that wIth enough pre-programmed drones, you can destroy all the big lumps of metal.
Like trucks, tanks, planes on the ground, field guns.
Or any transmitting radio - easy to detect.
Fuel stores
Then barracks
Then you've destroyed all the conventional forces and a lot of grunts, with mass produced relatively ordinary stuff.
The Iranian Shahed-136 drone from 2021 is estimated to cost $20k. With advances and mass production, the cost/effectiveness would change a lot. Commercial long range drones go from a few thousand.
One of your American, or Russian, billions would provide 50,000 of the things. And they fly home when done.
If the west do it first, what would happen if Putin nuked Kyiv? Nothing.