Well, well well...

[fillyboy]

Nothing wrong at all. It's perfectly acceptable that the likes of filly opens up Trump to ridicule. I'm all for it.


I saw no question marks, did you? Just some mild gloating.

No gloating, just pointing out peoples shifting positions when it comes to certain world leaders. Trump was initially ridiculed on here for suggesting he took the anti malaria drug, shortly after that it appears it's being trialled in various countries, (when I started that thread), then some peoples stance changed (read the thread it's all there), well we knew this all along, it's been researched for ages etc etc, then the trials found it to be worthless and of course it's gone full circle to trump being a nutter again.

Here's another example.
Trump bans flights into the US from China: response on here: he's a right wing racist.
Boris Johnson doesn't ban flights into the UK from China: response on here: he's putting everyone in the UK at risk, he's killing British citizens.

I think there's a few people on here who need to find a position, stick with it and stop all this hypocrisy,

 

[IT Minion]

Trump was initially ridiculed on here for suggesting he took the anti malaria drug,

You keep claiming that but don't point to a single example of it. Perhaps you've been spending too much time with Trump.

shortly after that it appears it's being trialled in various countries, (when I started that thread)

You've got the sequence wrong, it was already in trials in multiple countries before Trump recommended it, or your thread was posted. As I pointed out at the time it was already in use in a UK based trial.

, then some peoples stance changed (read the thread it's all there), well we knew this all along, it's been researched for ages etc etc, then the trials found it to be worthless and of course it's gone full circle to trump being a nutter again.

Here's another example.
Trump bans flights into the US from China: response on here: he's a right wing racist.
Boris Johnson doesn't ban flights into the UK from China: response on here: he's putting everyone in the UK at risk, he's killing British citizens.

Boring

I think there's a few people on here who need to find a position, stick with it and stop all this hypocrisy,

I know we can trust you to never change your mind. That's not a compliment.
.

 

[fillyboy]

As I pointed out at the time it was already in use in a UK based trial.

 

[transam]

No gloating, just pointing out peoples shifting positions when it comes to certain world leaders. Trump was initially ridiculed on here for suggesting he took the anti malaria drug, shortly after that it appears it's being trialled in various countries, (when I started that thread), then some peoples stance changed (read the thread it's all there), well we knew this all along, it's been researched for ages etc etc, then the trials found it to be worthless and of course it's gone full circle to trump being a nutter again.

Here's another example.
Trump bans flights into the US from China: response on here: he's a right wing racist.
Boris Johnson doesn't ban flights into the UK from China: response on here: he's putting everyone in the UK at risk, he's killing British citizens.

I think there's a few people on here who need to find a position, stick with it and stop all this hypocrisy,

Yep thats noseall and JD for you

Runs with the fox and hunts with the hounds

Probably has French genes

Cannot be trusted apart from. Making a pigs arris of them selves

 

[noseall]

Trump bans flights into the US from China: response on here: he's a right wing racist.

"Response on here"...? Nonsense.

Trump is a racist irrespective of his pointless decision to ban flights from China.

 

[Mottie]

I saw no question marks, did you? Just some mild gloating.

"Was The Donald right yet again" is clearly a question despite the missing question mark. You obviously read it as "The Donald was right again". Just some mild inability to comprehend on your part.

 

[noseall]

Just some mild inability to comprehend on your part.

Comprehend? Lol.
A lack of a question mark suggests rhetoric. Are you saying filly has a poor grasp of punctuation or comprehension?

Either way, filly and Trump were wrong - yet again.

Normal people 1-0 gammons.