This actually makes things 'worse' (more confusing), rather than better, but ...
[ for a start, assuming you were using R = V²/W for your calculations, with your W and V figures .I get fractionally different values of 'R' from you - 941.78Ω, 889.35Ω & 829.72Ω respectively - but those differences from yours are trivial and of no importance ]
That would, indeed, confuse Mr Ohm - or, rather, the Law named after him, since, as has been said, I don't think Mr Ohm himself talked at all about 'resistance' or knew anything of 'his equation'.
Mr Ohm would probably have become even more confused when he discovered that we were talking about something called 'alternating current'
You and I are familiar with that, and should understand that not only should R = V²/W become Z = V²/W when we're talking about AC (Z being impedance), but also that, even Z = V²/W is only correct when PF=1, otherwise it needs to be Z = (V²/W) x PF.
However, the tabulated data we've been shown appears to indicate that, with a motor,
PF falls (a little) with increasing voltage, which means that the impedances you've calculated for 231V and 241V probably should be
even more lower than the impedance at 217V than they are in your calculations.
Don't ask me
Kind Regards, John