"Snowflake" is a label applied to try to close down the debate.Not really, maybe you have.
Isn't a snowflake someone mentally fragile, easily offended who thinks that the world is unjust?
"Snowflake" is a label applied to try to close down the debate.Not really, maybe you have.
Isn't a snowflake someone mentally fragile, easily offended who thinks that the world is unjust?
I believe so, which makes me wonder why you think snowflakes would feel so comfortable with criminals and anarchists.Not really, maybe you have.
Isn't a snowflake someone mentally fragile, easily offended who thinks that the world is unjust?
There was no doubt in the Malkinson case eitherI don't think there was any doubt in this case because he also plead guilty.
I know you snowflakes like criminals and anarchy, but I am proudly and strongly opposed to anyone committing violent crimes.
He'll be put in a wing with other beasts, therefore getting "protection". He won't be locked up with burglars, fraudsters, car thiefs etc, they will all be like him.
+++++
Note
Posts advocating murder and violence have been removed
Mod
+++++
Well, in that case I wish you find some nice people like him along your way.I believe so, which makes me wonder why you think snowflakes would feel so comfortable with criminals and anarchists.
Of course, snowflake is just a silly made up insult, usually by more right wing people against those who lean towards the left. It's a daft insult that has no meaning, and only used as last resort after the argument is lost.
See above post for same answer.There was no doubt in the Malkinson case either
Sorry, I didn't mean to leave you out.There was no doubt in the Malkinson case either
What on earth are you talking about?Well, in that case I wish you find some nice people like him along your way.
Maybe if she was your sister or your mum you would change your mind a little.
When's "hug a violent criminal day"?
Sober up and read.What on earth are you talking about?
Sounds like you have been on the sauceSober up and read.
Or ask someone to explain it to you.
I think the moderators are referring to a reply I wrote which hinted that there would be violence towards this type of prisoner if they were put in with regular prisoners. It was removed, but somehow the removal notice got mixed in with your post.I didn't advocate murder or violence. And, I don't know where it was advocated.
Stivino
He should be put down.
There was no doubt in the Malkinson case either
Where was the doubt?Yes there was
The paper shufflers either missed it or decided to ignore it
And every one of em should be facing a jail term all there assets taken and pension pots which would be sold to cover any compensation pay ment
No exceptions
Than we will see if they learn from there mistakes