What a complete load of bo****cks , if you got something constructive to say OK , otherwise stick to your computor games.
Whats the problem with Daily Mail
- Thread starter anobium
- Start date
What a complete load of bo****cks , if you got something constructive to say OK , otherwise stick to your computor games.
Sponsored Links
How come the Express gets away without criticism? That really IS a shyte paper.
C
cantaloup63
Returning to the opening post, it does seem bit of a curious way to argue - attack the attackers of a sterotype by claiming that the attackers are of a stereotype themselves, and a not entirely credible stereotypical group at that 
Sponsored Links
C
cantaloup63
But the irony is that it tends to be the mail that get's quoted, presumably by non-mail readers
So how does that work what I said was entirely constructive, the mail is a reactionary small minded rag read by little englanders. I include the express in that quote. what do you expect when you start a thread like that.
by the way I dont play computer games.
All papers report basically the same drivel, the Mail included. I'm a DM reader, used to be a Mirror and /or Sun reader, the main reason for reading the DM is the fact that the ink from the print in it doesn't transfer to your fingers as readily as the other two. But I do like the style of the reporting in the paper too.
As for 'scaremongering' on the health issues, isn't it nice to know about a potential health risk, and make choices, rather than not? I read or skip through most of the paper, take note of the parts I want to and ignore the rest. Having read the other rags, they highlight on different articles, be it celebrity, sport, etc. But it's all about choice. It did used to wind me up, listening to people run the DM and its readers into the ground, comedians especially, but if their material relies upon what a certain paper reports, or the type of person who reads them, then that is their prerogative. Doesn't mean I have to like it, but I don't have to listen to it either. I have a choice, as does everyone else. If one paper reports an article in detail, guaranteed it will be in another paper within the week.
As for 'scaremongering' on the health issues, isn't it nice to know about a potential health risk, and make choices, rather than not? I read or skip through most of the paper, take note of the parts I want to and ignore the rest. Having read the other rags, they highlight on different articles, be it celebrity, sport, etc. But it's all about choice. It did used to wind me up, listening to people run the DM and its readers into the ground, comedians especially, but if their material relies upon what a certain paper reports, or the type of person who reads them, then that is their prerogative. Doesn't mean I have to like it, but I don't have to listen to it either. I have a choice, as does everyone else. If one paper reports an article in detail, guaranteed it will be in another paper within the week.
Wasnt it the mail on sunday that used to have the dodgy doctor giving out bogus health advice like take a warm bath in epsom salts for a brain tumor and the like.
As for the 2 million readers argument, millions watch x factor, eastenders and I'm a celebrity doesn't make them good
As for the 2 million readers argument, millions watch x factor, eastenders and I'm a celebrity doesn't make them good
How did it used to go?
Something along these lines I think
The Times is read by people who run the country
The Financial times is read by those who own it
The Guardian is read by those who think they should run it
The Mail is read by the wives of those who run the country
The Telegraph is read by those who think it should be run as it was 70 years ago
The Express readers still think it is
etc etc
Not far off is it
Something along these lines I think
The Times is read by people who run the country
The Financial times is read by those who own it
The Guardian is read by those who think they should run it
The Mail is read by the wives of those who run the country
The Telegraph is read by those who think it should be run as it was 70 years ago
The Express readers still think it is
etc etc
Not far off is it
C
cantaloup63
And so, armed with this insight, why post a thread complaining about stereotypes
Well if it might not be correct, it doesn't prove guilt, does it?
Sponsored Links