…….and I have never ever understood how, in Princess Diana’s words that the third person in her marriage was, after her death, accepted, not only by the royal family, but by the British public. Perhaps DIYNOT members can enlighten me,
When Charles Becomes King Camilla Will Become Queen Camilla…..
- Thread starter bolo 2
- Start date
Sponsored Links
i would say simply family interference with diana being no more than a child bearing machine who should be seen but not heard
so her natural outward going personality was to brash for the royal machine yes she was very shy but she became more confident and more active far more than the royal machine was comfortable with ??
so her natural outward going personality was to brash for the royal machine yes she was very shy but she became more confident and more active far more than the royal machine was comfortable with ??
Some of.
if the queen wishes her sons wife to be. Queen consort than good for her
blimey I recall when thousands of people camped out in London to wail and weep in public over some one they never knew never met
the country came to a halt
old duffers got on coaches travelled hundreds of miles to camp out out side buck house
They wanted to cuddle her two boys
and than a 12 year old and 8 year old who’s mother had just died in dire circumstances were forced to parade in public behind there mothers coffin in front of thousands of out of control wailing hysterical fools
the entire caper was imo a total disgrace
blimey I recall when thousands of people camped out in London to wail and weep in public over some one they never knew never met
the country came to a halt
old duffers got on coaches travelled hundreds of miles to camp out out side buck house
They wanted to cuddle her two boys
and than a 12 year old and 8 year old who’s mother had just died in dire circumstances were forced to parade in public behind there mothers coffin in front of thousands of out of control wailing hysterical fools
the entire caper was imo a total disgrace
Sponsored Links
if the queen wishes her sons wife to be. Queen consort than good for her
blimey I recall when thousands of people camped out in London to wail and weep in public over some one they never knew never met
the country came to a halt
old duffers got on coaches travelled hundreds of miles to camp out out side buck house
They wanted to cuddle her two boys
and than a 12 year old and 8 year old who’s mother had just died in dire circumstances were forced to parade in public behind there mothers coffin in front of thousands of out of control wailing hysterical fools
the entire caper was imo a total disgrace
yes i thought it wrong national tv came to a halt as iff that was the only important thing in the world yes sad and yes a future mother off a possible king but out off the family as such
i think it warranted a lot off time for those that cared but not to be forced on every person as iff we have no brains and need to be told what to think
Last edited:
Fair comment John, the tiny minority of lefty types will always be opposed to the Monarchy.
Which by that logic means that those who support an immigrant benefit scrounging family are right wing morons!
Even if it includes members of said 'family' who take advantage of trafficked girls and adulterers...
The sad thing about monarchists is that they by default value another family more than their own...
The French got it right!
Last edited:
When the Queen dies, that will signal the beginning of the end of the Royal family.
Prince Charles isn’t very popular he is bit of a stuffy bore, he will accelerate the decline of the Royal family.
Prince Charles should pass it on to William and Kate, who would be very popular.
My guess is Prince Charles will become king within 5 years
Prince Charles isn’t very popular he is bit of a stuffy bore, he will accelerate the decline of the Royal family.
Prince Charles should pass it on to William and Kate, who would be very popular.
My guess is Prince Charles will become king within 5 years
You're confusing "accept" with "don't care".
D
Deleted member 18243
...whilst being in favour of tyranny.
Better a stuffy bore than a trendy populist that changes with every fad and fashion. Prince Charles is an excellent, very British and traditional royal.
- Joined
- 25 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 2,604
- Reaction score
- 617
- Country
I met Diana once before she was linked to Charley, didn't impress me then and that probably set my opinion of her. Of course at the time Charles had to marry someone who met the royal standards of innocence and religion; being British helped as well. Diana's elder sister is a much nicer person (IMHO).
As for Charles and his views - I'd say he his a thoughtful person, very concerned about the future of the country, the planet and choses his words carefully to express his thoughts which are not always seen as popular but necessary.
As for Charles and his views - I'd say he his a thoughtful person, very concerned about the future of the country, the planet and choses his words carefully to express his thoughts which are not always seen as popular but necessary.
There's a 86% chance of that happening and a 29% of it happening within a year
I don't believe in the institution called the royal family. Btw I'm not a lefty loony. Neither would I wish any of them any harm whatsoever. I find it interesting that, especially in the modern era, people remain keen to be reigned over by people who are in their gilded positions through nothing more than being born (or marrying) into a firm. Does the firm do some good work. Yes. Do some of the firm dedicate their life to their duties? Yes. Are they a positive overall for the UK in terms of global handshaking? Perhaps. However even taking all of that into account, I fundamentally disagree with the notion of having an unelected family at the head of the country, enjoying a very privileged lifestyle funded through joe public, served by people often on quite low salaries.
I don't name call those in favour of a royal family, we are all entitled to our opinion on matters such as this, no? So I find it interesting that people who aren't in favour are often referred to as nutters and/or left leaning weirdos.
I don't name call those in favour of a royal family, we are all entitled to our opinion on matters such as this, no? So I find it interesting that people who aren't in favour are often referred to as nutters and/or left leaning weirdos.
I'm not sure why you felt the need to embellish my quote 'lefty types' with the words nutters and weirdos, but maybe you're right.
You need look no further than this forum to see that anyone 'hard left' despises three things.
The Monarchy
The country
Religion
Anyone who admits to following a religion is accused of being a nutjob who believes in sky fairies, anyone who holds up this country as an example of good is accused of being a 'flag shagger'.
I'm sure there must be examples of right leaning people who hold similar beliefs, but it certainly seems to be the left who are the most vocal.
D
Deleted member 18243
Britain's Royal Family has ruled for over a thousand years, so I'd trust them with the country's interests more than I would a government that changes every 5 years according to current trends. We are the greatest country in all history, and the country that has done more for civilisation than any other. That greatness was directed by the various kings and queens working in God's name.
Communism / Marxism, which has never created anything good, is relatively new and has brainwashed our population against the Royal Family and against Christianity, in a relentless effort to destroy traditional Britain. All your words DIY FUN, come from Marxist doctrine, whether you know it or not.
Go and open your front door to see what a mess Marxism has made.
Sponsored Links
