"I'm talking about both"
- but the question of where the socket's located is a red herring, because it HAS to be a certain distance from the tub. The tub's cable will therefore trail that distance if the socket's located outside. In any case, if I were to go with the 'cable through wall' option, the wall in question is right by the tub's location - so no trailing there. (Point taken about that being a 'nasty option' though!)
"An extension lead just compounds it because you'll have a non-weatherproof socket somewhere in the garden."
- that's something I've never suggested doing and wouldn't do. If I used an 'extension' of any sort it'd either be an indoor one located indoors (with the tub cable coming in to meet it), or an 'outdoor socket kit' leading to a fixed outdoor socket
"When you first fill it you'll need the heater on for at least 24 hours to get it up to temperature, and if you want to be spontaneous in your use of it, i.e. not have to plan hours in advance, you'll probably need to have it running all the time. Still, that's only £300-odd per quarter."
- hmm... can't help thinking somebody would have noticed if this was the case. Typical customer experience seems to be that it takes about 7-8 hours to get the water heated initially, with running costs thereafter in the region of £60 a quarter (dependent on usage). As I say, my understanding is that these tubs are pretty well insulated.
"It's more realistic to supply it from an existing circuit. (But you'll still need to have an outdoor socket installed in a suitable location)."
- so does this mean that rather than my electrician needing to install a new, dedicated circuit, there's a possibility he could tap into an existing circuit to intall an outdoor socket? (And is that really so different from the 'outdoor socket kit' option that doesn't require rewiring?)
Thanks for bearing with me BAS by the way!