B
Bodd
50/50
That would be a start.And I will write English
That would be a start.
Could 'of'. FFS.
Therefore should have been more to the left.The dash cam vehicle was slightly ahead and at the point of impact was not overtaking a parked car.
Of course he was. It would have avoided the collision.As others have said oncoming vehicle crossed the centre line. Dashcam vehicle should have moved over more, but was not obliged to.
The dash cam vehicle was slightly ahead and at the point of impact was not overtaking a parked car. As others have said oncoming vehicle crossed the centre line. Dashcam vehicle should have moved over more, but was not obliged to
Even if that is correct, why smash your mirror instead of moving left?
Would you not have done that instinctively anyway
Even if that is correct, why smash your mirror instead of moving left?
Would you not have done that instinctively anyway?
View attachment 176261
How far apart do cars A and B have to be before D (dashcam) is obliged to move to the left or conversely how close do A and B have to be so that D is not obliged to?
Correct.Driver with dash cam had no reason to be centre of road as they have clear road , but oncoming driver also had no reason to be in centre of road
Concur. Appalling driving on both counts. The odds of an accident occurring when you have two crap drivers on the same stretch of tarmac, increase exponentially.Both poor drivers .