I wouldn't, but I don't believe for a moment that such would be the case.But you wouldn't want to replace a fuse every time a lamp failed.
I can't say that I've got any incandescent lamps protected by 1A fuses these days - but, although I do use a fair number of 1A ones (mainly for trivial 'electronic' loads) I have very rarely, if ever, had to replace one of them.I guess in relativity that doesn't happen as you would know about it!
Your guess is as good as mine. One imagines that replacement of (thermally or mechanically) damaged ones is probably the most common reason but, beyond that, I really don't know. However, the amount of 'shelf space' given to them in the sheds etc. suggests that there must be a pretty significant market.What would you speculate plugs are purchased for these days ?
Mum once plugged two 2Kw heaters into a normal extension lead while I was out. The lead of course got very hot but the 13 amp fuse in the plug did not blow?
Why was this, surely 17 amps through the fuse should of caused it to blow!
My guess is it was a faulty fuse, i wonder how many fuses are faulty?
It would take a long time (probably well over an hour) for 17A to blow a 13A fuse. If it were a (hypothetical) 13A Type B MCB it would take up to an hour to operate at ~19A.Mum once plugged two 2Kw heaters into a normal extension lead while I was out. The lead of course got very hot but the 13 amp fuse in the plug did not blow? ... Why was this, surely 17 amps through the fuse should of caused it to blow!
When ever you buy a plug in light/lamp, they always come with a 3 amp fuse in the plug?
Now as most of these lamps will be drawing under 230 watts, would it not be more safer to have a 1 amp fuse in the plug instead?
And while the cable and lamp holders of most lamps is rated at least 3 amps and likely the reason for the 3 amp fuse in the plug, is it not best practice to use the lowest fuse ratting suitable?
A3 amp fuse is probably safer than the method used elsewhere in the world including the rest of Europe and the USA. They don't have any fuses at all in the plugs and rely on a 10A or 15A MCB in the supply to the sockets.Would it not be more safer to have a 1 amp fuse in the plug instead?
So at least teaching below 750W = 3A and above = 13A is easy for school teachers to remember and teach.
Not really - 3A at 240V is 720W. The same resistive appliance at 230V will be 662W.3 amp x 230v (official UK voltage) = 690 watts not 750 watts
I don't think rounding up comes into it.(690w commonly round up to 700w).
What does that prove?Same goes for 13 amp being rounded up from 2990w to 3000w
But not in this case (if talking about flex). 1kW @ 240V is 4.17A. What danger is there?Also I would not want a 13 amp fuse in 1KW appliance fed by 1mm² cable; thus they need to teach that 5 amp is sometimes needed as 3 amps is to low and 13 amps is to high.
What about the English teacher?Also a lot of teachers (especially at secondary school level) only know what they need to teach of the syllabus, i.e I was never taught ohms law at school what I think should be.
We didn't do such things. It hadn't been invented.Also I was once taught in a ICT lesson that a drive (i.e. cd drive) and a driver (i.e. software to make hardware work) were the same thing!
Does that not depend upon the nature of "the 1kW appliance"? If the load were not one which was considered 'unlikely to create an overload' (note the double negative!), then there would be a theoretical issue with 1mm² flex protected by a 13A fuse, wouldn't there?But not in this case (if talking about flex). 1kW @ 240V is 4.17A. What danger is there?Also I would not want a 13 amp fuse in 1KW appliance fed by 1mm² cable; thus they need to teach that 5 amp is sometimes needed as 3 amps is to low and 13 amps is to high.
Not really - 3A at 240V is 720W. The same resistive appliance at 230V will be 662W.
You have to use the voltage quoted by the manufacturer or convert the power.
But not in this case (if talking about flex). 1kW @ 240V is 4.17A. What danger is there?
That would be true but what is this 1kW load which could do that (in the home?)?Does that not depend upon the nature of "the 1kW appliance"? If the load were not one which was considered 'unlikely to create an overload' (note the double negative!), then there would be a theoretical issue with 1mm² flex protected by a 13A fuse, wouldn't there?But not in this case (if talking about flex). 1kW @ 240V is 4.17A. What danger is there?Also I would not want a 13 amp fuse in 1KW appliance fed by 1mm² cable; thus they need to teach that 5 amp is sometimes needed as 3 amps is to low and 13 amps is to high.
It doesn't. However, it might require a little bit more 'genius' to understand that Ohm's Law only applies to 'dumb resistive' loads. With the more intelligent loads that we are increasingly seeing (e.g. those powered by a SMPSU), a decrease in supply voltage will actually lead to an increase in current (and little change in power).I don't think it takes a genius to understand that a appliance that is rated at 240v will consume less than it's rated current and thus less power at 230v - Ohms law.
A vacuum cleaner or similar, something like a 1kW fan heater, a good few DIY power tools etc. etc. (the common feature in all those examples being the presence of a motor which could jam)?That would be true but what is this 1kW load which could do that (in the home?)?
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local