Although IDE originally referred to the drive package, it quickly became adopted to describe the interface, and rightly so IMHO, but it became ambiguous when SATA drives appeared. ATA, which, as a popular term, was superceded by IDE, is also ambiguous.
I don't see the point in railing against the changing of definitions - they happen for a reason. In this case parallel ATA is so termed to distinguish from serial ATA, and seems pretty clear to me.
I don't see the point in railing against the changing of definitions - they happen for a reason. In this case parallel ATA is so termed to distinguish from serial ATA, and seems pretty clear to me.