I think their point is that, Mr Yousless wants to introduce a law that will benefit him.Not much point in reporting something that occurred before the law came into force.
I've got to watch what I say as I might be accused of a hate crime.
I think their point is that, Mr Yousless wants to introduce a law that will benefit him.Not much point in reporting something that occurred before the law came into force.
You've not really got your head around this concept of aggravated by prejudice. There is no time limit on the "single source". Historic sources would do just fine.Not much point in reporting something that occurred before the law came into force.
But it's not a long stretch between acting upon the prejudice with hate, given the circumstances: such as the rise in anti-semitic and anti-muslim sentiment as the war in Gaza has progressed.We do not have similar laws in England and Wales.
In England and Wales a person is free to be prejudiced against Jews and transgender for example without these being counted as aggravating factors should they be accused of a public order offence.
There is a big difference between having hate as a motive and simply being prejudiced.
Not what the real legal bods are sayingYou've not really got your head around this concept of aggravated by prejudice. There is no time limit on the "single source". Historic sources would do just fine.
MBK is not very savvy with the law.Not what the real legal bods are saying