Woman dies after attack (Ed.)

Irrelevant. My point is, they were able to get them inside.
Not irrelevant at all...

Were they on drugs before incarceration or did they get the addiction whilst inside is a reasonable question to ask...

Regardless of the availability of drugs inside or outside...

Simply swerving the question shows you have no idea of the problem and thus no clue as to the solution!
 
Sponsored Links
Not irrelevant at all...

Were they on drugs before incarceration or did they get the addiction whilst inside is a reasonable question to ask...

Regardless of the availability of drugs inside or outside...

Simply swerving the question shows you have no idea of the problem and thus no clue as to the solution!
FFS you argumentative tw@t, my point was that they couldn’t get off drugs while inside but they were going to try now that they were out. Who cares where they got their addiction, it’s irrelevant.
 
Last edited:
We do not need more prisons.. we need better prisons that actually work and sentences that reflect the crime not a politicians wet dream to get re-elected... Have a look at the bbc documentary Parole... the last one covered a bloke that was locked up for 17 years after first getting an IPP sentence... the ones where you can serve indefinite time if you do not satisfy the parole board... He got 2.5 years for his orginal crime and is still in prison...as his crime was committed whilst under the influence of drugs, whilst in prison he has not managed to kick the habit and be released...after 17 years they have put him on a two year wait for a special unit to treat his drug addiction...

17 years in prison and he is still a drug addict...just whose fault is that.... probably ours as we keep telling the politicians that we want more and more people locked up for longer , hence the budget goes to incarnation rather that offender management eg Mental health services.. 14% of prisons have a serious mental health condition, treatment places available 0.4% of the prison population..so that means some 13.5% of prisoners are just dumped back on the streets untreated at the end of their sentence...and we wonder why a nutter goes berserk with a knife.
The welfare and rehabilitation of prisoners is of zero concern to all political parties, which is why the transprisoner was allowed to transfer to a female prison
 
Irrelevant. My point is, they were able to get them inside.
This is how sh1te prisons are. I was watching the tv prog 'Parole' the other night and one of the parole board members said 'part of the challenge is we know drugs are readily available to inmates.'

'How?' should be the question.

Pathetic.
 
Sponsored Links
This is how sh1te prisons are. I was watching the tv prog 'Parole' the other night and one of the parole board members said 'part of the challenge is we know drugs are readily available to inmates.'

'How?' should be the question.

Pathetic.
Because the screws let them bring drugs in, to keep the junkies quiet. Then, they drug test inmates who they know are clean, so that they can say there are no drugs in their jail.
 
Because, like illegal immigration to a small island, it would be easy to stop if there was any political will to do so.
As I've said before, our political machine in this country is very good at talking ... and talking ... and talking. Point with thumb, put on faux sincere voice and concerned face, spout some very obvious guff about 'we're going to ...'

Meanwhile, weeks turn into months turn into years (sometimes decades) and we see very little actual improvement. In the words of Elvis, 'A little less conversation, a little more action, please.'
 
Who'd have thought that criminals were good at committing crime.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top