I'm just thinking that you are a troll
I am not a troll and have never claimed to be one on this forum.
I just believe now that you are so entrenched in your viewpoint, that if I told you white was white and black was black that you would argue the toss rather agree.
Well, that is the kind of thing a troll would do, but I am not a troll.
The UK has less bargaining power standing alone than as part of a larger organisation
So let me get this straight.
You think we would have less bargaining power, with a body that exports goods to us, than we would as part of them, what exactly is it you think we wouldn't be able to agree on, that we MUST be in the EU to achieve, bearing in mind EFTA and WTO membership?
I have used examples of German cars and French nuclear power - as examples, but more generallistically I am saying that the UK has lost its own ability to produce things in many industries and thus we are reliant on imports.
Yes, and somehow you seem to suggest the EU countries won't want to sell us these goods as a non EU member.
Riiiiiiiight.......
You conveniently forget the rebate the UK has
You mean the rebate I specifically commented on in another post.
Funny how I forgot to forget it.
plus all of the EU funding that UK projects recieve.
Why, how generous of them to give us back some of our own money, THANK YOU EU!!
EDIT: Also who is to say we want these projects funded, they could essentially be forcing us to pay for projects we deem unnecessary or unwanted.
but it not like we just pay in and don't get anything back as you are indicating.
Where did I indicate that?
Horse meat and breast plants were not created under EU legislation. They broke EU legislation
Didn't read those links did you.
The EU legislation is faulty, and the way it is enforced makes it more open to abuse.
But of course, if you had read those links, or done further research, you would know that.
Errrr a minor difference is that Sweden are a member of the EU and not the EFTA. As such they are subject to the same migration rules as the UK. They may well choose to implemently differently, but they are still bound by the same laws.
The Swedish safeguards are through a EFTA agreement.
We are not a member of the EFTA, Sweden and 3 other countries are.
YOUR point was that we would still have to allow unimpeded immigration through the EFTA, which is clearly false.
Like in all other things, you are wrong.