- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,625
- Reaction score
- 2,338
- Country
It might seem obvious to you but that has nothing to do with 15 minute city proposals.it seems quite obvious to me you'll not have the freedom to drive when and where you want.
You may have a gut feeling that the initial concepts will lead to that but don't conflate different issues and come to the wrong conclusion. It'll just get you to things like "Bill Gates", who has already been mentioned on this very thread.
There is no "transgression". There is absolutely nothing in the 15 minute city proposals which limits travel in any way.it wouldn't take long for you to become a "transgressor" if your a keen angler.
There is no "trip you up" mode. What is concerning about this statement?Denso never admits there's any downsides and when these are pointed goes into trip you up spoiler mode.
"A 15-minute city offers amenities that residents want and need locally. It does not require us to use them. Residents who want to travel longer distances for any reason, by car or other means, are free to do so – but travel is a choice, not a necessity. A 15-minute city gives back the time lost travelling to reach basic services such as grocery shops, schools, recreation and healthcare facilities, giving us more choice over how and where we spend our time. A 15-minute city strategy also makes walking, riding and public transport easier and more accessible, providing more options for how we travel across the city."
C40 Knowledge Community
www.c40knowledgehub.org
Do you think "it says that, but I just don't believe it"? That would be one view. But don't pretend they are proposing things which they are not.