If you are going to be charging off it (as opposed to it being only for information, i.e. 'used xxx kwh for lighting, and yyy kwh for small power) the it needs to be a MID approved meter
If I understand correctly, I presume that there already is a 3-phase board (probably more than 4-way), supplying 3-phase circuits for the other users and single-phase circuit(s) for the OP.Possible but not something that is desirable, necessary or to be recommended. ... If you only want a few circuits, a 2 or 4 way 3 phase board would be a far better option, those would provide up to 6 or 12 single phase circuits and still retain the possibility of one or more 3 phase circuits as well for the inevitable day when some new piece of 3 phase equipment arrives. ... For metering, a meter is installed. A 3 phase one in the supply to your new board.
Some are.for example 3 phase meter is over £130
I suppose so ...Some are. Others are not. https://meters.co.uk/products/mx300-100/
I suppose I probably would not argue with that...Genuine retro meter from the 80’s. Were built to last.
That's a no brainer, even if a single phase CU is fitted on only one phase it's semi future proofed.
Existing 3 phase supply -> 5 core cable -> 3 phase meter -> 5 core cable -> new 3 phase board which can have a selection of single or 3 phase circuits connected.because he presumably would then have to separately monitor/meter each of his single-phase circuits (and add up the figures) (or perhaps use a 3-pahse 'check meter' if he has only three single-phase circuits on different phases).
Indeed. I misunderstood, and thought you were suggesting that the entire installation (including the OP's single-phase circuits) should be fed from a single 3-phase board (which is why I said that was probably what they already had).Existing 3 phase supply -> 5 core cable -> 3 phase meter -> 5 core cable -> new 3 phase board which can have a selection of single or 3 phase circuits connected. Meter registers total energy used for the new board regardless of what circuits are in it. ... It's just a sub board with it's own meter.
but it does not actually say three phase can't under the control of an ordinary person maybe some one can clarify what control an ordinary person is permitted.BS7671:2008 said:530.3.4 For an installation with a 230 V single-phase supply rated up to 100A that is under the control of ordinary persons. Switchgear and controlgear assemblies shall either comply with BS EN 60439-3 and Regulation 432.1 or be a consumer unit incorporating components and protective devices specified by the manufacturer complying with BS EN 60439-3, including the conditional short-circuit test described in Annex ZA of BS EN 60439-3.
The BS7671 definition of a Consumer Unit does not say much of that - only that it is 'type tested and that it must have a DP main switch. The rest of what you say comes, as you illustrate, from the situation in which use of a Consumer Unit allows one to avoid what is effectively a requirement for 16kA devices, per 536.4.201 of BS7671:2018 (your 530.3.4 from BS7671:2008).I have over the years been told a consumer unit is a type tested distribution unit with a maximum of 100 amp single phase for use in premises in the control of an ordinary person.
I think you're probably making this more complicated than it is. The bit of 536.4.201 (530.3.4 in 17th) you quote is merely a dispensation/relaxation saying that IF it is a "230 V single-phase supply rated up to 100A that is under the control of ordinary persons.", then use of a type-tested CU allows one to use devices with a lower breaking capacity. In all other cases, including that of a 3-phase supply (and regardless of who is 'in control' of it), the primary part of that reg applies, namely:... but it does not actually say three phase can't under the control of an ordinary person maybe some one can clarify what control an ordinary person is permitted.
Nothing in that reg (nor anything else in BS7671 of which I am aware) says anything about who may, or may not, be 'in control of' a 3-phase supply.536.4.201 of BS7671:2018 said:The relevant fault current (short-circuit) rating of the assembly should be equal to or exceed the maximum prospective fault current at the point of connection to the system.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local