B
blightymam
So despite my stating explicitly that my motive is to ascertain transam's motive for highlighting this incident, and not the vast majority of other, more serious, incidents in other countries, you still come to your own different conclusion. Why did you bother asking? You had already made up your own mind.
My previous offer stands: if transam can provide an example of him highlighting an incident of violence against women that does not explicitly or by intimation involve Islam or Asian countries, I will public humiliate my self.
As you are trying to steer the thread away from that challenge, I can only assume that, you also expect transam will be unable to meet my challenge.
If transam resorts to his usual torrent of nonsense, the reason will be obvious, because he is unable to provide an example of him highlighting violence against women without an underlying attempt to denigrate Islam or Asian countries.
See, the things you can't understand are that Trans may not have a sinister motive, he may just be sharing a story he heard on the news, which was a fairly big story I may add. If the way many women are treated within the Muslim faith pee's Trans off about it then quite frankly good on him. If it makes him anti-Islam because of the way women are treated - then good on him again. He doesn't have to like the faith, he doesn't have to highlight all faiths or rapes in order to put a post up about the Muslim way of life in some parts.
He also doesn't have to answer to you or justify his posts because as much as you don't like it, you are not lord master of this forum. And lastly, I'll bet he doesn't give two hoots as to what you think of him and his posts, and nor should he.
And yes, I agree with Mitch. There is no 'if'.