Maybe the person(s) who invented Appendix 15 had it in their mind(s) that 433.1.204's minimum requirement of a CCC or 20A for the cable of a ring final circuit also applied to the cable of an unfused spur,
such that it might not be adequate for 26A, but would be adequate for what they regarded (as seemingly other do) as being the (20A) 'rating' of a double socket - hence their guidance that an unfused 2.5mm spur could supply one double socket but not two single ones (which I don't think anyone disputes would each be 'rated' at 13A)?
You're free to 'dispute', since your guess about 'intent' is as good as mine. As you know, what it says (in part) is;
433.1.204 Accessories to BS 1363 may be supplied through a ring final circuit, with or without unfused spurs, protected by a 30 A or 32 A protective device .......... Such circuits are deemed to meet the requirements of Regulation 433.1.1 if the current-carrying capacity (Iz) of the cable is not less than 20 A and if .....
Probably not. Unlike cable of the ring itself, we re not talking about cable which, were it not a ring, would be 'under-protected'. However, again, we don't know what was in the mind of the person who wrote the guidance in App 15 - since they could, theoretically have given examples of a 1.5 mm² unfused spur supplying one single socket (but didn't).
True (albeit guidance, rather than 'a rule') - but, again, for whatever reason they seem to be assuming that the CCC of 2.5mm² cable may be less than 26A.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below,
or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Please select a service and enter a location to continue...
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local