Afghan hijackers

Status
Not open for further replies.
you can say what you like about here but maggie would NEVER have given in to terrorists.

Blair can say what he likes about fighting terrorism but hes a puppet who let hundreds of irish terrorists off the hook
 
Sponsored Links
Brightness said:
The bombing is far from over though is it? How many of our troops have been killed out there so far?
Only a very small proportion of the number of civilians who have been killed by the allied forces.


OK, so UK and US aren't bombing now but you can bet your life that the Iraqi terrorists are!

And the UK and US troops carry out retaliation attacks on women, children, wedding parties, demonstrators ,market shoppers and anyone else who is in the way when they want revenge.

I doubt very much if they care who they kill or maim either.

I hope this comment only shows a lack of understanding. Can you explain why you feel that people are killing and maiming for no reason at all? Is this what you yourself would be doing in such a situation?
 
Thermo said:
Blair can say what he likes about fighting terrorism but hes a puppet who let hundreds of irish terrorists off the hook

Here, here Thermo - don't forget about the hundreds of thousands of compo that some of them received too...




hermes said:
Brightness said:
The bombing is far from over though is it? How many of our troops have been killed out there so far?
Only a very small proportion of the number of civilians who have been killed by the allied forces.


OK, so UK and US aren't bombing now but you can bet your life that the Iraqi terrorists are!

And the UK and US troops carry out retaliation attacks on women, children, wedding parties, demonstrators ,market shoppers and anyone else who is in the way when they want revenge.

I doubt very much if they care who they kill or maim either.

I hope this comment only shows a lack of understanding. Can you explain why you feel that people are killing and maiming for no reason at all? Is this what you yourself would be doing in such a situation?


Hermes, I agree that the amount of troops killed is only a fraction of the amount of civillians - I never said that it wasn't.

Which retaliation attacks are you referring to? I only know of the highly publicised internet video one - could you elaborate further or provide evidence? I still say that the Iraqi terrorists - not normal people but terrorists (there is a major difference here) are still bombing anyone they fancy.

I don't think I need to explain why I think why terrorists are killing and maiming anyone they fancy. They have no morals at all do they? Come on Hermes, I would have given you credit for being far more intelligent than that!

Oh and please Hermes, don't tar me with the same brush as the terrorists. I would not go killing, maiming and raping just for the pleasure of it - the Taliban seem to enjoy doing so though.

Women and minorities have been repressed in Iraq for years :cry:
 
Let's just clear something up :-

Saddam Hussein is the former president of IRAQ.

The Taliban are the former rulers of AFGHANISTAN.

Maggie was a LOONY.
 
Sponsored Links
Absolutely sickening, Plastered. Tony Bliar should be ashamed of himself for sending our forces out there :cry:

My sympathies go out to their familes and may they both rest in eternal peace
6.gif
 
Richardp said:
which one would you send back first ?
_41404097_afghan_comp2416.jpg

number 9 is my favorite :LOL:

Im sure at least six of them have worked in our local kebab shop..

Nice to know the precedent is set anyway...nick a plane...terrorise the hostages...fly to england...the red carpet awaits...

They sound like really nice people dont they..

Let em in Tony baby you'l need the votes in the next election.
 
Thermo said you can say what you like about Maggie; O K She shut down 55,000 mental health beds and sold the hospitals to rich people in the private housing market. She cut the heart out of our country.

As for terrorists I agree we must never give in to them. Hijackers should be put in prison for twenty years and then see what the situation is in their country when it is time for their release. If we still can't send them back keep them in prison until we can. Asylum seekers should stop at the first country that is safe. Not travel through many safe countries to arrive in England. As for economic migrants; providing they work and abide by our laws why not let them find a better life for their families. Many of us would.

BE HAPPY
 
Because Williams, we are a tiny overcrowded country. We are full up.


joe
 
joe-90 said:
Because Williams, we are a tiny overcrowded country. We are full up.


joe
So you would remain in poverty when there is an opportunity to improve the lot for your wife and children .
 
williams89 said:
joe-90 said:
Because Williams, we are a tiny overcrowded country. We are full up.


joe
So you would remain in poverty when there is an opportunity to improve the lot for your wife and children .

No. But I wouldn't expect to gate crash someone elses party.

Let them go to Australia - they've got loads of room - but few asylum seekers.


joe
 
joe-90 said:
williams89 said:
joe-90 said:
Because Williams, we are a tiny overcrowded country. We are full up.


joe
So you would remain in poverty when there is an opportunity to improve the lot for your wife and children .

No. But I wouldn't expect to gate crash someone elses party.

Let them go to Australia - they've got loads of room - but few asylum seekers.


joe
O K my friend you have a point other countries should chip in but I think we should just agree to differ on this one.
 
It's not agreeing to differ. You are wrong. At what point do YOU think the UK is full up?


joe
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top