- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
You debase my motivation to that similar to your own. I am not motivated by a desire to point score, or win an argument. I am motivated by what I see as morally corrupt behaviour demonising immigrants for being immigrants, and for no other reason.You dont want an open honest discussion all you want is to shut down any useful discussion because you are driven by some desire to take the moral high ground to make yourself look good, not for any desire to find any solution.
Man has migrated ever since he walked the earth. Man will continue to migrate for so long as he is able to walk. All animals do so. It is a survival instinct.
To demonise people for doing so is devisive, hate-filled, and short-sighted.
A better solution is to look for the reasons why man wants to migrate and mitigate those reasons. That is the cooperative, long-term, morally justified action.
Now to address your "moral high ground" basis for your accusation:
Using a well-worn but hollow and inappropriate excuse for an argument, you are
a) exploiting a strawman argument,
b) recognising that demonising immigrants for being immigrants is morally corrupt, and
c) illustrating the weakness or absence of your argument.
It is a strawman argument for the reasons given above, i.e, my motivation is because it is morally corrupt to demonise immigrants, not for some childish desire to score point or to "win" an argument, or because some grudge is being carried.
It recognises the morally corrupt basis of demonising immigrants, because it recognises that to oppose such behaviour is morally justified.
It illustrates the weakness of your own reasoning due to the resorting to the use of well-worn, but hollow and inappropriate arguments.
Last edited: