Anti-vaxxers don't want you to read this. **Links are required for all claims**

[Notch7]

change a couple of its letters and you'll see that

that is the strongest evidence you have

seriously Andy you are as mad as a box of frogs

 

[Brigade77]

Dr. Ryan Cole. Just another under qualified nutjob speaking about things way above his head. No doubt his qualifications will be pulled, all his positions cancelled & every previous patient of his will sue his ass for malpractice.

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/a-re...-the-poison-covid911-jab_cDnYG1n8fRAYF27.html

 

[Captain Nemesis]

Just so that I dont get falsely accused of fabricating quotes, I'll show the verbatim first, and then one modified in a very common and acceptable way, which has been done by established and respected news reporting organisations all over the world for ever, when they want to make a quote more understandable in a standalone scenario, by adding words in [ ... ] No other words not so parenthesised are fabricated. Adding explanatory expansions clearly identified by [ ... ] is not regarded by any serious person as "fabrication".

1) No I haven't drilled down into the data as it's a load of irrelevant bullsh1t

By 8th September the vaccines had killed 1645 people in Britain and there had been 1,119,683 reported adverse reactions.

[But] I haven't [properly looked at] the data [which I am summarising here as a figure of 1645 people killed by the vaccine] as it's a load of irrelevant bullsh1t

 

[denso13]

Dr. Ryan Cole. Just another under qualified nutjob speaking about things way above his head.

Well done, add proven liar and conman and we're in agreement.

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/08/v...ess-claims-about-safety-of-covid-19-vaccines/

 

[Brigade77]

.

 

[Brigade77]

There are only 3 proven facts that I believe in & these are the only 3.

1. You were born.
2. You will die.
3. Flat roofs leak.

Everything else is subjective/objective & only becomes a "fact" if you place your trust in the source.

 

[IT Minion]

There are only 3 proven facts that I believe in & these are the only 3.

1. You were born.
2. You will die.
3. Flat roofs leak.

Everything else is subjective/objective & only becomes a "fact" if you place your trust in the source.

Fun fact, your second point is unproven. It's just a theory. Like Gravity.

 

[johnny2007]

There are only 3 proven facts that I believe in & these are the only 3.

1. You were born.
2. You will die.
3. Flat roofs leak.

Everything else is subjective/objective & only becomes a "fact" if you place your trust in the source.

Where are the links???
Wanna get barred?

 

[Deleted member 18243]

Who benefits from hearing "both sides"?

Captain N my commie friend it is and has long been our system of democratic parliamentary government that both (or more) sides of a case are heard, debated, thrashed out, etc. etc. and the best solution obtained. What is different about covid? Why is only one side of the argument allowed?

What kind of person thinks that both sides are valid?

Both (or more) sides of a case may or may not be valid. Both sides can be wrong, as with Biden vs the Taliban or Labour vs Conservatives. Allowing for only one side, my commie friend, is invalid.

 

[denso13]

& only becomes a "fact" if you place your trust in the source.

Not really, if you place your trust in someone for the wrong reasons it certainly isn't a fact. It means you have been conned.

 

[johnny2007]

Not really, if you place your trust in someone for the wrong reasons it certainly isn't a fact. It means you have been conned.

What about you?
Where's the link to this claim?

 

[denso13]

Why is only one side of the argument allowed?

But you believe, upfront, that covid is a hoax. What is there to argue about?

 

[johnny2007]

Captain N my commie friend it is and has long been our system of democratic parliamentary government that both (or more) sides of a case are heard, debated, thrashed out, etc. etc. and the best solution obtained. What is different about covid? Why is only one side of the argument allowed?



Both (or more) sides of a case may or may not be valid. Both sides can be wrong, as with Biden vs the Taliban or Labour vs Conservatives. Allowing for only one side, my commie friend, is invalid.

Links please!

 

[Deleted member 18243]

So you were playing silly games when you asked the question?

No, just exposing the ludicrousness of your orthodoxies.

 

[Brigade77]

Where are the links???
Wanna get barred?

1. Birth records
2. Death records
3. Any flat roof you care to inspect.