Anti-vaxxers don't want you to read this. **Links are required for all claims**

[JohnD]

that's an interesting assertion. Can you find this claim on any reputable source?

So thats a "no" from Andy

 

[Deleted member 18243]

that's an interesting assertion. Can you find this claim on any reputable source?

Sorry John it's not from a reputable source, it's from the British Government - it's from their yellow card reporting system. The same government publishes the covid death numbers, so why do you believe them on covid deaths but not vaccine deaths?

I've posted the relevant link at least 3 times in the past - look through my posts - and we've had the same subsequent discussion a number of times.

 

[Captain Nemesis]

(Mind you it could just be that for some reason being anti Covid vaccine is considered being abusive by the mods ).

Id vote for that.

Its an abuse of science.

Its an abuse of truth.

Its an abuse of evidence.

Its an abuse of reason.

Its an abuse of free speech as it kills people.

 

[John the plumber]

Id vote for that.

Its an abuse of science.

Its an abuse of truth.

Its an abuse of evidence.

Its an abuse of reason.

Its an abuse of free speech as it kills people.

I’m guessing you voted for bojo in the last election then as it
Sounds like your talking about Bojo and his governments handling of Covid 19 there and I couldn’t have put that better myself regarding what he tells the nation about Covid 19

 

[Captain Nemesis]

The mods and site owners in general have a duty to keep antivaxxers nonsense from being spouted anywhere.

I couldnt agree more.

Sadly it seems they could hardly agree less.

 

[John the plumber]

I couldnt agree more.

Sadly it seems they could hardly agree less.

I disagree,it has been said by the mods that being anti Covid vaccine is considered abusive.
Also using the term r&*+d vaxxer or s****le isn’t allowed but anti vaxxer is.
Also anyone who is anti vaccine is allowed to be called anything and be abused but if they be abusive back then they get banned from a thread so I’m afraid your wrong.

 

[Deleted member 18243]

It is spousal abuse if the antivaxxer husband prevents the wife access to a vaccine.

Correct.

It is downright dangerous and potentially lethal when antivaxxers spout their lies to the public.

It's free speech in a free country, we ought to hear both sides. Suppression of opposition is a tactic of the nazis, the communists and their ilk.

The mods and site owners in general have a duty to keep antivaxxers nonsense from being spouted anywhere.

It's not illegal to spout nonsense, unless it's illegal nonsense.

It is child abuse if the antivaxxer mom or dad deny them the vaccine.

Extremely incorrect! A child belongs to its parents, not the government. Nazis, communists and their ilk believe that children belong to the state. And it's mum not mom. Sieg Heil Noseall!

 

[ellal]

I disagree,it has been said by the mods that being anti Covid vaccine is considered abusive.
Also using the term r&*+d vaxxer or s****le isn’t allowed but anti vaxxer is.
Also anyone who is anti vaccine is allowed to be called anything and be abused but if they be abusive back then they get banned from a thread so I’m afraid your wrong.

Are we allowed to call r***d vaxxers human guinea pigs?

 

[John the plumber]

Are we allowed to call r***d vaxxers human guinea pigs?

 

[Captain Nemesis]

I've posted the relevant link at least 3 times in the past

Two questions for you.

1) Have you drilled down into the data to see how many of the people who suffered a reaction had underlying health conditions? Quite an important consideration when you think how skewed towards the elderly and those with underlying health conditions the vaccinations have been.

2) What point are you trying to make anyway by telling us that there is a fatal reaction in about 1 in 30,000 people?

 

[IT Minion]

By the same token just because someone dies within 28 days of a positive covid test it doesn't mean that they died of covid.

Indeed, those dead within 28 days of the test might not even have had covid, given the unreliability of these tests.

But every single yellow card report of an adverse effect is absolutely down to Covid. Riiiiight.

 

[Captain Nemesis]

It's free speech in a free country, we ought to hear both sides.

Ive paired up the "both sides" for you.

Truth.           Lies.
Facts.           Fiction.
Evidence.        Fantasies.
Rationality.     Insanity.
Responsibility.  Irresponsibility.
Life.            Death.

Who benefits from hearing "both sides"?

What kind of person thinks that both sides are valid?

Which side are you on?

 

[Captain Nemesis]

Extremely incorrect! A child belongs to its parents

So a child is simply a possession, and can be treated by its parents in any way they see fit.

What a bizarre world you live in.

 

[Captain Nemesis]

Are we allowed to call r***d vaxxers human guinea pigs?

In any decent, civilised, rational, truth- evidence- and facts-based context, no, you should not be.

Should you be allowed to spread your message of death-dealing insanity? No, you should not.

 

[denso13]

Are we allowed to call r***d vaxxers human guinea pigs?

Why would you?