Well we have to give it a name, so let's just call it God and have done with it. We'll never know its true nature so why worry about it?
Thank you. Please don't tell them that Mike used the 'B' word.
No problem here, I can use that word safely as no insult is meant to any race. When used to insult black people the B word is highly offensive to them, and I don't have any colour prejudice.
Thank you. Please don't tell them that Mike used the 'B' word.
No problem here, I can use that word safely as no insult is meant to any race. When used to insult black people the B word is highly offensive to them, and I don't have any colour prejudice.
Actually, I believe the word 'black' is in vogue again now and so is perfectly acceptable. 'People of colour', 'coloured' and, of course, the 'N' word are certainly out of fashion.
Oh and its not for us to prove that God exists, we can tell he does from the signs all around us
Ooh, that's sexist. I'm going to report you to the BBD (British Brigade of Do-gooders).
Please do, and also don't forget I used the racist term Black Hole, so don't forget to report me to the race relations board, if there is one still being funded under the prosperty measures!
I think you'll find, if you're B you can call each other Ns, and if you're a Q, then you can decide if you're also G, if you're a W then you decide if you're a S... if you're an M then you may be an I...and if you're O, then YFB !!!
so you guys have run out of material for Black holes, in this God thread? so why not change to a race thread
TBH, there should be no room for race and colour prejudice on any forums, in fact not just on forums only, but in every walk of life
Everytime life is created it's a work of God. If you think that's wrong - then tell me how life is created.
As an example, creationists incessantly use some difficult-to-explain facet of biology as "proof" of a creator. The problem is that, though there is no non-design explanation for how precisely a certain organ could have evolved at the moment, one may be discovered in the future. Contrary to the instincts of many creationists, lack of an explanation does not justify confecting whatever explanation one would prefer. The inexplicable is just that, and does not justify speculation as proof.
Sometimes creationists compute the astronomical odds against a molecule having a certain structure from the simple probability of n atoms arranging themselves so. They gloss over the fact that chemical laws trim most of the extraneous possibilities away. For instance, there are many ways to theoretically arrange hydrogen atoms and oxygen atoms in a molecule, but in reality, most of what forms is H2O. Note that the creationist's fundamental error is not his ignorance of this fact, but his assumption that there is nothing more to know.
Problems starts when one race feels superior and insults another, that is the prime cause of the hatred in the world today
The more science learns - the closer they get to God. The two are inseparable.