H
holmslaw
..
No, you did not.I was way ahead of you and correctly answered your question,
I guess it was my fault for forgetting that you refuse to act like a responsible and intelligent adult.its not my fault that you're incapable of asking an unambiguos question.
Don't forget to go away and not return until you have matured.Don't forget the thanks button.
Actually, he did correctly answer the question you wrote down. The fact that what you wrote wasn't what you intended is the issue - and just like we are having this discussion on interpretation of regs, holmslaw chose a valid interpretation of your question.No, you did not.I was way ahead of you and correctly answered your question,
I guess it was my fault for forgetting that you refuse to act like a responsible and intelligent adultits not my fault that you're incapable of asking an unambiguos question.
But nice to see you putting some colour back into your posts, much prettier than plain old monochrome textWhen 3-core was R/Y/B, which colour(s) did people use for N?
And why?
Actually though, in the context of domestic work which is where this thread is based, and being a pedant at heart ...But nice to see you putting some colour back into your posts, much prettier than plain old monochrome textWhen 3-core was R/Y/B, which colour(s) did people use for N?
And why?
Given the contiguous sequence of:Actually, he did correctly answer the question you wrote down. The fact that what you wrote wasn't what you intended is the issue - and just like we are having this discussion on interpretation of regs, holmslaw chose a valid interpretation of your question.
There is no black core in non-harmonised 3-core cable, so the correct answer can't be black.The correct answer would of course be black - because whatever core you used, you'd sleeve it black for compliance with regs and for safety.
You asked which colour people would use, if you wanted to know which core, you should have asked which core. You started this whole argument by being pedantic about the meaning of "reasonable". But really, it's no more obtuse than your arguments - and I fail to see where you are going, other than to prove that people have been using mixed colours for a very long time without, apparently, the world ending.To answer it other than saying which core people used for N is deliberately obtuse.
OK - if you want people to believe that when you saw the uninterrupted sequence:You asked which colour people would use, if you wanted to know which core, you should have asked which core.
It is neither pedantic nor obtuse to wonder how on earth deliberately choosing, for no reason, to make an installation more dangerous than you have to can be regarded as a reasonable thing to do.You started this whole argument by being pedantic about the meaning of "reasonable". But really, it's no more obtuse than your arguments -
I was just asking sparkwright a question.and I fail to see where you are going, other than to prove that people have been using mixed colours for a very long time without, apparently, the world ending.
No - pay attention.So you seem to have started with the argument that it cannot be considered reasonably safe to mix colours, but then go on to give an example of how this has in fact been standard practice for as long as I can recall, without summoning the four horsemen.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local