Yes, that took a lot of working out.It also says "Health officials have warned that those in multi-generational households are at more risk of infecting their elders".
It is difficult to infect people who are not there.
Yes, that took a lot of working out.It also says "Health officials have warned that those in multi-generational households are at more risk of infecting their elders".
I bet it did, was it the 'multi generation' bit that threw you instead of just household?Yes, that took a lot of working out.
It is difficult to infect people who are not there.
EFLI has nailed it though.I thought we were considering the hypothesis of large multi-generational families of facilitating the spread of the virus.
But do let us know your conclusion on the grandparent thingy.
Assuming that the rest of the 30-yr olds are asymptomatic, and so are their partners and children, the cycle of infection will be exacerbated. The asymptomatic children will be out and about, or at school, etc.Also,
Consider six thirty - yr olds hanging around together outside a shop or takeaway, for example.
One infects the others, and all take it home.
A couple live with their parents, one with one parent, a couple with partner, and one alone.
How many become ill enough to display symptoms and get tested? Less than six say?
Contrast that with the six originals, going back to their multi - generational households.
There could reasonably be ten grandparents, plus the same number of parents.
How many now become ill enough to be tested?
I fully agree, it is a multi-factorial issue, and I fully agree BAME families are more likely to be in the circumstances that you describe, small BAME families, single-person BAME households and multi-generational BAME households.EFLI has nailed it though.
Multigenerational families, by clever deduction must include grandparents........since one might assume parents with children are just "families", not "multigenerational"
My guess it's a multi factorial issue......BAMe families are more likely to be poor, increasing chance of being multigenerational. They are more likely to be in low paid work that is likely to be an essential worker and at higher risk of infection. They are less likely to be able to work from home and more likely to choose earning money than lowering infection risk.
Consider six thirty - yr olds hanging around together outside a shop or takeaway, for example.
One infects the others
That isn't disputed.It also says "Health officials have warned that those in multi-generational households are at more risk of infecting their elders".
I very much doubt that was in anyone's thoughts during the referendum. I certainly didn't hear any politician refer to it.You missed out spread viruses .
It is relevant when we are talking about whole neighbourhoods having their movement restricted. Maybe going forward, movement between different countries will be restricted even more, and that should be a good thing, environmentally as well .I very much doubt that was in anyone's thoughts during the referendum. I certainly didn't hear any politician refer to it.
So, shall we consider it irrelevant to this discussion?
Additionally, all EU member, and non-EU states have the ability, the authority and the right to limit movement between nation states during circumstances such as this.
Within the context of "Are Large, multi-Generational Families More Likely to Spread Corona Virus?" I think Brexit and the import, or export of viruses is irrelevant.It is relevant when we are talking about whole neighbourhoods having their movement restricted. Maybe going forward, movement between different countries will be restricted even more, and that should be a good thing, environmentally as well .
Pure conjecture am afraid. It's not what's happening up and down the country.I would still maintain that those living in multi-generational households are less likely to socialise, and for those that do, and infect the rest of their family, are more likely to be detected and forced to isolate. They are also more likely to be subject to peer pressure from the rest of their family, to not socialise in the first place.
.
Can you please get it right? It's coronavirus, not Corona Virus.Within the context of "Are Large, multi-Generational Families More Likely to Spread Corona Virus?" I think Brexit and the import, or export of viruses is irrelevant.
I have given my reasons for my conjecture.Pure conjecture am afraid. It's not what's happening up and down the country.
Because I see them. I see them at the supermarket, I see the kids/youngsters at the packed pubs near me, I see large families with grannie eat at a restaurant near me, I see them at the garden centre as a family day out.I have given my reasons for my conjecture.
On what do you base your conjecture that younger members of multi-generational families are likely to be out socialising?
But irrespective of that, my points about a) grandparents are less likely to be out and about, and/or shielding, b) if younger members are infected they are highly likely to infect their grandparents, and c) the 'officials' are more likely to be alerted to such young infected people than if they were not in multi-generational families, all hold true.
Then why did ellal bring up Brexit ?Within the context of "Are Large, multi-Generational Families More Likely to Spread Corona Virus?" I think Brexit and the import, or export of viruses is irrelevant.