- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,413
- Reaction score
- 2,641
- Country
See post #8. I already addressed this. The whole point is the government of the day can incentivise courses that add value to society.
Thanks for that link. I don’t know what you studied at uni but it sure as **** wasn’t irony!
Yep.I don’t know too many professors who are wealthy CEOs. But I know plenty of super wealthy CEOs who don’t have degrees.
Education level is not a measure of intelligence.
See post #8. I already addressed this. The whole point is the government of the day can incentivise courses that add value to society.
As is assuming intelligence if you've gone to university.Unbelievable arrogance to assume someone is thick, because they didn't go to Uni.
indeed to massage the unemployment figures in the 70s and at least the early 80 encouraged people to go on the "sick " to reduce unemploymentUniversity education was massively extended by thatcher, on the face of it to extend higher education opportunities to more people, in reality to hide the loss of jobs for 16/18 year olds following her decimation of the industrial economy and the jobs it provided. It was inevitable that the new uni's would mass produce courses like media studies to attract people who didn't/couldn't want to study science or engineering. Many new uni's were taking on students even if they failed their A Levels before the govt realised that didn't look great. People buy degrees now i.e. the amount you pay you expect to pass at the very least, there are still high drop out rates in may uni's.
Blup
Right to buy, the biggest con prior to brexhit.indeed to massage the unemployment figures in the 70s and at least the early 80 encouraged people to go on the "sick " to reduce unemployment
politicians for short term gains have introduced disastrous policies like "right to buy " with out replacing housing stock then encouraging people to go on the sick"
stopping 16/17/ 18 year olds claiming benefits off any sort as there parents responsibility
giving overcrowded youngsters at extreme conflict with parents the only option off forming a family unit to become a high priority by getting pregnant not a good solution at all but the modern world we live in
It depends. Universities rarely spend money on studies that nobody is interested it.Should the tax payer fund this development if the study provides little benefit to society? Or to phrase it another way..
All are important topics. Biology has proved to be very useful in recent years.In world where we compete on a global scale, do we need more people with degrees in:
Gender and politics or Biology?
Free university = asking a stranger to fund your education. So what is the return on their investment? Or is it ok for you to learn about whatever you fancy while they work and pay taxes to pay for it?
There is nothing random about the idea at all. The state could simply subsidise courses that it deemed to be a good return on the investment.
It’s no different to a points system for skilled immigrants applying for work visas.
I don’t know too many professors who are wealthy CEOs. But I know plenty of super wealthy CEOs who don’t have degrees.
Education level is not a measure of intelligence.
Thanks for clearing up the fact that you now hide behind the 'irony' label when you always talk b ollux...Thanks for that link. I don’t know what you studied at uni but it sure as **** wasn’t irony!
Tell me how many uneducated people made scientific discoveries like penicillin, RNA sequencing etc