If that's correct, the manufacturer and installer will have zero responsibility. More likely those responsible at local authority level or academy/trust level for not maintaining and passing on records of construction, or carrying out proper surveys of condition. You can see a situation where the responsibility for the school has passed from LEA to trust, but none of the expertise and knowledge that goes with it because they have all retired or been made redundant. And the school trust has none either.From what I understand, part of the issue is that “normal” concrete is waterproof, but the RAAC is not. (Or at least more susceptible to damage)
If built to the intended standard and maintained, it should be covered in a high quality roofing material to prevent moisture.
However budget saving patching has resulted in the panels getting wet due to delays and cheap coverings.
The moisture affects the RAAC more than a solid concrete panel
At leat that’s what a guy on the radio said.
That's about right.
Water gets in.
Crumbling, freeze-thaw, etc.
Rebar corrodes.
Add this is the fact that "soggy" concrete is a lot heavier than dry, aerated, and this is why it's a problem.
Blup