BBC news Black out

[aveatry]

It wouldn’t make any difference what you read, you will never be “any the wiser”

I knew it when I wrote it that some childish t w a t would take the bit and use it in that way. This forum is getting beyond a joke when you have to examine every thing you say so sections can not be isolated and taken out of context.

 

[IT Minion]

I wouldn't tar all Jedi on the actions of one rogue person.

Luke Skywalker killed 3 million in the death star whilst following the voices he heard in his head as part of the actions of an illegal terrorist group.

 

[aveatry]

Was on BBC 6 hours ago
Look under budget 2024 section.

It was on LBC main headlines and on GB news headlines main page but as you say it was not on the BBC main page and you had to look for it but it wasn't there last night even in the 24 budget section that you said as I checked after I saw your post. I am not doubting that is was in that section and you saw it. But that is something else the BBC news do - they burry things fast that they really do not want to report on.

 

[ajohn]

they burry things fast that they really do not want to report on.

LOL. Perhaps they should put it all on one web page.

 

[JohnD]

Do you think its lawful

Do you think it's honest, to falsely pretend English law says something that it doesn't?

 

[aveatry]

Why doesn't Tommy stand for election.

That gets your own standard #6 reply --
1 "no it doesn't"
2 Utter nonsense.
3 Who are these you speak of?
4 It isn't being controlled by the lizards....
5 When did it say that
6 Ask them?
7 Seriously?
8 Then you will waste your time collating the proof and they will completely ignore it.
9 Completely make things up that you said and heavily edit your post to fit their point,
10 will make things up that you are thinking and post them in quote marks like its something that you actually said.
11 deliberately try to antagonise the poster to try and get the thread shut down or the poster banned.
12. Telling you, you ought to apologise, for correcting their incorrect fact.
13. Stating their opinion as fact, without any source or material to back it up. Otherwise known as a NotchyFact™
14 Accuse people of being XY or Z via some mental gymnastic spurious associations
Its actually best just to not reply and let them takeover and have their own circular Wan# over the subject

 

[denso13]

Its actually best just to not reply

 

[motorbiking]

I wouldn't tar all Jedi on the actions of one rogue person.

me neither.

would you agree that tarring all Jedi with the actions of one rogue person could be stirring hatred to Jedi?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

It was on LBC main headlines and on GB news headlines main page but as you say it was not on the BBC main page and you had to look for it but it wasn't there last night even in the 24 budget section that you said as I checked after I saw your post. I am not doubting that is was in that section and you saw it. But that is something else the BBC news do - they burry things fast that they really do not want to report on.

So it's not a news blackout . I agree. It was there last night night, look at the date on it.

Not buried, just under a relevant heading.

 

[motorbiking]

Do you think it's honest, to falsely pretend English law says something that it doesn't?

if you ever find an example of me doing that be sure to share your detailed arguments.

Hint: it needs to be more than quoting me and responding with:

1 "no it doesn't"

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Do you think its lawful to stir hatred towards a group of people that you have Labelled Zionists? yes/no

Another closed question

Can't you handle bigger pictures ?

 

[denso13]

would you agree that tarring all Jedi with the actions of one rogue person could be stirring hatred to Jedi?

No. Most can see the bigger picture. Criticism is allowed.

 

[aveatry]

A 1 then.

You are not allowed to use the leftard lefty list of standard reply's - actually most on the list are direct quotes from your posts.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

You don't need to understand the laws you might be breaking? Good luck with that.

If laws are so straight forward why do prosecution and defence both have different lawyers arguing over the same points?

 

[motorbiking]

No. Most can see the bigger picture.

Do you think it would be insulting to Jedi

Jedi are a murderous cult.