- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,405
- Reaction score
- 2,318
- Country
But you said you don't support his views?You’ve been sold a lie.
You’ve never been able to get past the msm though.
But you said you don't support his views?You’ve been sold a lie.
You’ve never been able to get past the msm though.
Nobody has yet come up with a better site for a balanced general view of the news.Well, yes, of course they do. So what?
Yep I have older relatives who only get their news from the BBC, they even have the app and go running to it when it notify of a news flash or new items. When we talk about things - lets say like trump they repeat the latest lines that they have seen on the BBC. The BBC makes their views for them. I ask them about the march in London yesterday - they do not know anything about it "what march" but you can bet that if it had kicked off yesterday then they would be saying - did you see all that trouble yesterday.The point being most people will ever just see or listen to the headlines, and the choice of headlines the BBC use forms a very distinctive trait. A trait that seems not only to inform but also guide their viewers into what they should be thinking.
Even when the beeb are on my side, such as hoping Trump looses, it is obvious they are taking sides. And that from a broadcaster sworn to be neutral is wrong. They are biased.
Where do you think is a better site for a general balanced view of the news ?Yep I have older relatives who only get their news from the BBC, they even have the app and go running to it when it notify of a news flash or new items. When we talk about things - lets say like trump they repeat the latest lines that they have seen on the BBC. The BBC makes their views for them. I ask them about the march in London yesterday - they do not know anything about it "what march" but you can bet that if it had kicked off yesterday then they would be saying - did you see all that trouble yesterday.
The BBc have the audacity to feed me "verify" and "In-depth" or "bbc fact check" or feed they even have a Disinformation & Social Media Correspondent. Yet the disinformation is more in what they dont tell you rather that what they do
I don’t support his views.But you said you don't support his views?
Then block them and go elsewhere. No one is forcing you to follow the BBC.The BBc have the audacity to feed me "verify" and "In-depth" or "bbc fact check" or feed they even have a Disinformation & Social Media Correspondent
But he still can't name a better sourceThen block them and go elsewhere. No one is forcing you to follow the BBC.
The BBC used to serve this function. But bias has crept in.Where do you think is a better site for a general balanced view of the news ?
Here is a photo of Notches 600 peopleThere weren’t it was more like 600
Not arguing that.The BBC used to serve this function. But bias has crept in.
These days you have to do your own journalism and read the same story from different viewpoints.
And then read between the lines.
Then you must be in agreement that the BBC are either biased, or to be fairer, not thorough in their news reporting.Not arguing that.
But that doesnt prove the BBC as being a poor site for general news if there is no better site for it
Fúck me, Essex must have emptied!Here is a photo of Notches 600 people
View attachment 360684
Dick headFúck me, Essex must have emptied!