They reckon that people can have a paedo living next door to them and not even know it. I know for a fact that I don’t because I have a cracking pair of 8 year old twins living next door to me........
It would appear so but it is not a nuance. Does that make it right?
Prepubescent children.
No.
What about it? Does it affect puberty?
I do not know the exact details of either case but the definition of the word is quite simple and clear.
Why are you arguing about it? You might as well say a teenager is anyone up to the age of eighteen.
As you have shown, one would need more than luck.
Perhaps the same misnomer.
Would a strapping 6'2" fifteen year old boy with a beard be treated by such a doctor?
Incidentally the spelling is "paed..." except, of course in the US.
Maybe you could then explain to the population that the sexual assault of a girl or boy aged 11/12 isn't the action of a pedophile?
(Gary Glitter thus wasn't an active pedophile, but Saville was)
So good luck with that!
Incorrect.Again.While you might have a point with words such as "jam", "gay", "sick", and the like, others on which legal decisions are made (such as the item in discussion - paedophilia) do not "evolve", other than by mistakes and misuse.
Stick to bending pipesIncorrect.Again.
Is there an actual specific age when all individuals reach puberty rather than a legal one?
And what about mental age?
Maybe you could then explain to the population that the sexual assault of a girl or boy aged 11/12 isn't the action of a pedophile?
(Gary Glitter thus wasn't an active pedophile, but Saville was
Nice try...Not reality though!.keep up.Times change.The girls that Prince Andrew allegedly had sex with were not pre pubescent, so he cant be called a paedophile.
Nice try...Not reality though!.keep up.Times change.
Go on then, Jackanory.I could tell you the whole story but it's a long one.
Notchy the wafflerTimes dont change for him, ignorance is a static state
Nice try...Not reality though!.keep up.Times change.