Are they denying that they placed officers at the sight to protect it?
Yes. Did youIt would have helped if you read the article though rather than just the headline.
Read the background brief. The police didn't cover it, the park admin often cover it for big demos.Are they denying that they placed officers at the sight to protect it?
Did they feel the need to cover any other monuments?
I wonder who told them to do it?
The police do that sort of thing all the time.Come on read the article its not just covered but then the Met have to station police to protect it. Its not just the headline.
Officials in Hyde Park yesterday hid Britain's first public memorial to the six million victims of the Nazi genocide under a blue tarpaulin in a move one Holocaust survivor called 'shameful'.
The monument was then guarded by Metropolitan Police officers to stop it being targeted by pro-Palestine protesters who marched through London in yet another demonstration against the war in Gaza.
Another misleading title.Its all too plain to see. Have you forgotten what the title of this thread is.
It would have helped if you read the article though rather than just the headline.
Have you read it ? TrollHe loves to read a headline
He loves to read a headline
Its all too plain to see. Have you forgotten what the title of this thread is.
Explain or show where that has occurred please?
As I said - criticising the slaughter in Gaza, is not hating Jews.
I wonder why.I think you'll find the Met retracted the claim that he was being “provocative.”