He was comparing if you was under a certain age you'd more likely to end up in hospital if you'd been jabbed than if you got the virus and needed hospital treatment.Do you know when the paper was published? It isn't new..
He was comparing if you was under a certain age you'd more likely to end up in hospital if you'd been jabbed than if you got the virus and needed hospital treatment.Do you know when the paper was published? It isn't new..
Irrelevant. The claim was "emerging evidence". It isn't, the paper in question is 6 months old, and it isn't Japanese.He was comparing if you was under a certain age you'd more likely to end up in hospital if you'd been jabbed than if you got the virus and needed hospital treatment.
Your claims mean nothing. If you can provide any evidence then crack on.If you don’t recognise the “link” between the mRNA vaccines and excess deaths and illness then you are very stupid.
Like shooting fish in a barrel. You have nothing.Is that how you twist it 6 out of 10 for effort.
Big pharmas got you under their spellYour claims mean nothing. If you can provide any evidence then crack on.
It's the fact that it is old news, from 2021,So the recent upsurge in myocarditis is a conspiracy theory ?
They are. Open your eyes and look into it.Why won’t the medical establishment and the big pharmaceutical companies investigate it
Before I do that, do you have this evidence?Ok
a Japanese report states 1 in 1000 serious adverse reactions to phi ser and 1 in 650 to Moderna.
Now put your head back in the sand
Any findings they've put in the public domain for perusal.They are. Open your eyes and look into it.
Try searching on myocarditis mrna vaccine research for example.