BLOODY HELL!!!

Sponsored Links
There are reports that it deployed an anchor to try to slow down. This may have been what caused the change of direction.

But it does look like it was not seaworthy.

EDIT Port anchor deployed, so didn't make much difference.
 
Last edited:
There are reports that it deployed an anchor to try to slow down. This may have been what caused the change of direction.

But it does look like it was not seaworthy.

EDIT Port anchor deployed, so didn't make much difference.
It was the pilot's call to drop the anchor to try and change the ship's drift.
 
Sponsored Links
The issue is the depth, not the weight of the ship.

In shallow water the anchor would not be hugely effective at stopping it. The channel is around 15m

But the aim was to use the anchor to drag as an alternative to a rudder. That would probably have worked if they had enough time.
 
Interesting fact: Its the chain and not the anchor that has the greater stabilising importance.
 
They would typically have around 300-350M, the anchors would be around 1-1.5T each the scope is around 10 X heavier. But it depends how much they got down.

Even 10-20 tons worth of chain and anchor bouncing along the sea bed would be enough to cause the vessel to turn, but it all takes time.
 
434227628_25004853025829056_4925324905944496802_n.jpg
 
Some republicans are blaming Biden for this mishap :ROFLMAO:
 
Well someone should have installed protection for the bridge. It was a disaster waiting to happen.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top