Not for you it isn’t.I think it is worth a read yes
Not for you it isn’t.I think it is worth a read yes
Good morning NotchNot for you it isn’t.
Yes, but do you think it is a worthwhile subject for the UN to look into?I think it is worth a read yes.
The UN Secratiariat published the document.Yes, but do you think it is a worthwhile subject for the UN to look into?
Do you think that it was a worthwhile exercise?One would think they had already looked into it.
Have you read the document in full? It is quite large and I would be surprised if you were able to have digested all of its contents in 45 minutes.Do you think that it was a worthwhile exercise?
It's a yes or no answer which you have swerved several times now.Have you read the document in full? It is quite large and I would be surprised if you were able to have digested all of its contents in 45 minutes.
I'm interested in the contents of the dossier, which you've read I presume?It's a yes or no answer which you have swerved several times now.
Once more, do you think it was worthwhile for the UN to look into Replacement Migration: Is it A Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?
I'm not talking about the outcomes, was it worthy of investigation?
Ok, I think you are being dishonest about your motives for bringing this up. It was a simple question.I'm interested in the contents of the dossier, which you've read I presume?
I think you don't like facts. You have access to the facts of the dossier, so either read what is in it or don't. But don't start trying to angle opinions without digesting the information first. All it does is start arguments rather than discussions. More light, less heat.Ok, I think you are being dishonest about your motives for bringing this up. It was a simple question.
Why are you still trying to take it all out of context though.I think you don't like facts. You have access to the facts of the dossier, so either read what is in it or don't. But don't start trying to angle opinions without digesting the information first. All it does is start arguments rather than discussions. More light, less heat.
Some have more, some have less, some have next to none. Your premise is flawed.Western nations with aging populations have an influx of migrants entering countries illegally and these migrants are being settled legally.
Well at least we agree there are different numbers of migrants entering different western countries.Some have more, some have less, some have next to none. Your premise is flawed.
You mean, it states the obvious?it talks about different percentages of people needed to migrate to different countries based on the level of the aging population within it.