We will see in the New Year.
After a hearing and an appeal?
Has he thought of something new to say?
Or does he imagine there are a lot of voters who want a perve in Parliament?
We will see in the New Year.
Some doOr does he imagine there are a lot of voters who want a perve in Parliament?
Don't think bumming someone is worthy of lifting an eyebrow in the bars that the tories drink in at the house of commons.
Do you think theyre all fine upstanding parliamentarians who drink in the bars of Westminster.Some do
The internal party investigation was delayed five years due to an administrative error, the file was lost. The complainant withdrew his complaint because of tory incompetence, nothing on that from ree-smugg though because they are not civil servants.And it's come to light after how long why now?
Why would it be considered weird in this f*cked up world.?
Will his behaviour be acceptable then?We will see in the New Year.
Could be then that when he was a prominent member of the brexiteer side of the tories he was afforded some protection and now the remainder side has gained the upper hand he's been thrown under a bus.The internal party investigation was delayed five years due to an administrative error, the file was lost. The complainant withdrew his complaint because of tory incompetence, nothing on that from ree-smugg though because they are not civil servants.
So he should have been metaphorically thrown under the bus a long time ago.Could be then that when he was a prominent member of the brexiteer side of the tories he was afforded some protection and now the remainder side has gained the upper hand he's been thrown under a bus.
The panel who found him guilty weren't MP's? Do you know the political leanings of the panel or how/if they voted on Brexit?and now the remainder side has gained the upper hand he's been thrown under a bus.
What does that matter the evidence was 'lost' at the time brexiteer were at their most prominent when Boris got an 80 seat majority.The panel who found him guilty weren't MP's? Do you know the political leanings of the panel or how/if they voted on Brexit?
It was before that.What does that matter the evidence was 'lost' at the time brexiteer were at their most prominent when Boris got an 80 seat majority.
Can't see him making such a significant difference as he remained a back bencher.So he should have been metaphorically thrown under the bus a long time ago.
And the Tory party would have suffered for it.
So, in whose benefit was the original complaint 'lost'?
Do you mean before the referendum went the way of the no vote? Bit hard to ascertain off blubs post.It was before that.
And other back-benchers' misdemeanours have caused the party severe loss of support.Can't see him making such a significant difference as he remained a back bencher.
Who are these.And other back-benchers' misdemeanours have caused the party severe loss of support.