Of course it's NOT racist.
Apart from the definition of the word having nothing to do with religion, You can't see what race the wearer is, can you? She may be white.
Considering that Londons population is 1 Muslim to 5 and the overall UK population is 5-8% Muslim, 51% to 41% is very favourable but doesn't very well support what you're saying.
If you'd bothered to read the article:
I have never said that.Oh, you mean in the sense that anti-semitism is not racist.
Because I say correctly that something is not racist does not mean I am in favour of racism or that that something is OK.And does that make it OK?
No, it was in genuine concern for your obvious predicament in not seeing the answers for what they were...So you are resorting to being personal now then? Excellent.
No, it was in genuine concern for your obvious predicament in not seeing the answers for what they were...
Ah, the 'almighty' has spoken in place of his disciple...that doesn't work -you are the one that is wrong
I have never said that.
There are usually various recognisable communities within a society, e.g Muslim, Jewish, Irish, Travelling, etc.and if the women wearing burkas fit into Western society, considering we are 'socialised' differently.
Neither good or bad, it just is. Similarly, the wearing of a crucifix, turban, kilt, shtreimel, etc, etc is neither good or bad. Is it important?So the women wearing burkas have been conditioned? Is that a good thing I wonder...
Not a reasonable comparison. There are many reports from Muslim women that confirm that they are not pressured, obligated, forced to wear any particular garment.Not oppressed! I still can't believe you compare school uniform! Does school uniform have a history based by men controlling women? Is school uniform just for females?
I think you are confused.I didn't say you did
"A raspberry is not a berry"
"Oh, you mean in the sense that a strawberry is not a berry."
"I never said that a strawberry is not a berry"
Oh, you mean in the sense that anti-semitism is not racist.Of course it's NOT racist.
Apart from the definition of the word having nothing to do with religion, You can't see what race the wearer is, can you? She may be white.
And does that make it OK?
The current legislation deals with hate crimes.Of course it's NOT racist.
Apart from the definition of the word having nothing to do with religion, You can't see what race the wearer is, can you? She may be white.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45130532The police and Crown Prosecution Service define a hate crime as "any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice, based on a person's disability or perceived disability; race or perceived race; or religion or perceived religion; or sexual orientation or perceived sexual orientation or transgender identity or perceived transgender identity".
I would suggest that being a Sky customer is highly likely to place you in a certain quantile of the population.Considering that Londons population is 1 Muslim to 5 and the overall UK population is 5-8% Muslim, 51% to 41% is very favourable but doesn't very well support what you're saying.
Sky Data interviewed a nationally representative sample of 1,649 Sky customers ...