boxing ring for kendor, D&J and the rest of the world!!

[AdamW]

My picture of our friend Kendor is a middle aged mature student who smokes rollies, drinks halves, is a black le*bian with 4 kids by a surrogate mother and claims incapacity benefit

Hey, now that's just out of order!

 

[kevplumb]

you speak for yourself adam

i know where i,d rarther be

btw i wouldnt be typing

 

[david and julie]

panjandrum wrote,

On the particular point in question I was fairly sure I DID understand what Kendor meant.
I understand him to be pointing out a moral ambiguity: that people are responding sympathetically to ninebob who has openly confessed his offence here - while the same people, he implies, would condemn the general class of those who have done the same thing.
The words he uses, and the order in which he places them, may not be ideal. But I thought the meaning was pretty clear just the same; and on this point I think he is right.

But your assumption is hypothetical, therefore it is neither right nor wrong. Until kendor has confirmed what he meant your assumptions may be wrong. This is the the point I was trying to make, all his posts are ambiguous and he changes his answer to suit. I can only repeat my original question

Can anyone honestly say you 100% understand the above?

you only gave your interpretation of his comments which differs from mine. kendor will change everything to suit him/herself anyway.

 

[big-all]

david and july i hope you took my light hearted comments as an attempt to difuse the situation in a light hearted way and not having a go at any body especialy you [both]

 

[Panjandrum]

I don't believe my assumption to be hypothetical.
Mostly because I did not make any assumption.
The meaning of the words used by Kendor is, as far as I am concerned, unambiguous and not subject to subjective interpretation.
It is entirely possible of course that my a posteriori understanding is not the same as his a priori intention.
I am hypothesising that what you are suggesting is that he may not have in fact meant to say what I am understanding him to have said.
EDIT to add:
D&J suggested that "you only gave your interpretation of his comments which differs from mine. kendor will change everything to suit him/herself anyway."
You might well be right - my experience of kendor is much more limited than yours. But it would be helpful to know your interpretation of kendor's comments. Could you provide this?

 

[kendor]

I think I do. Not being a regular member of this web site community, and therefore not taking sides, I think Kendor is saying that if someone criticises a crime or action, he should criticise it whoever commits it. For example, one shouldn't be 100% against drink driving when committed by someone unknown in a newspaper report but then be less critical, even sympathetic, when committed by someone who just happens to contribute regularly to this web site.

I can see where he is coming from - even though I wouldn't personally apply it to every situation one comes across in life.

This reply sums up exactly what DforDave thinks and I am trying to say. Kendor is giving double meanings to most of his replies and then changing them to suit.

DforDave, wait for his answer and then give me another reply, the mans an ar**hole and you will soon see it.

This has me even more curious,

I could put it in bengalise or chinese or russian if you like it would make no difference to you as all you seem to do is try to pick holes in things instead of coming out with any form of constructive argument. My colleagues here read and understood exactly the gist of what i was saying so perhaps you need new reading glasses then?

Now just tell me kendor which public body do you work for which allows you and your colleaauges to study this forum in the afternoon?

I'll let Dfor Dave make up his own mind as to what he thinks, as you will notice D&J have highlighted a couple of words here and there and it's this manipulation of what people say taken out of the context of the whole that they try to twist to their own gain.
Unfortunately for agreeing with me you may now leave yourself open to abuse like myself and others on here receive from these thoroughly nasty persons.
I don't work for any public body and i'm also nothing like the person that jasy paints, you both make assumptions all the time and this is where you keep falling down in any argument along with the constant abuse when you can't think of anything constructive.
Well i've said my lot and i think i should have done this a long time ago, I will totally ignore any comment from either D&J or Jasy from now on so feel free to carry on in your childish ways with your stream of abuse as it all goes over my head anyway

 

[kendor]

On the particular point in question I was fairly sure I DID understand what Kendor meant.
I understand him to be pointing out a moral ambiguity: that people are responding sympathetically to ninebob who has openly confessed his offence here - while the same people, he implies, would condemn the general class of those who have done the same thing.
The words he uses, and the order in which he places them, may not be ideal. But I thought the meaning was pretty clear just the same; and on this point I think he is right.

Glad someone on here got what i was saying so it can't be all that gobbledegook can it?

 

[pipme]

#@££ $%^ &*()!"£: @~} {_+<>/* --- Ok !! Anchors.. begone !!

 

[ohmygodwhathaveyoudone]

MARMALADE.see i can spell big words too.

 

[pipme]

MARMALADE.see i can spell big words too.

Next you need a capital letter following the full stop, and a capital I for i -- You been away Ohmy ? Missing the fun !

 

[ohmygodwhathaveyoudone]

looking @ the recent posts don't think i've missed anything at all.

 

[Panjandrum]

Ah, but if you had been there at the time

 

[petewood]

I will totally ignore any comment from either D&J or Jasy from now

Bet you don't.

 

[kendor]

I will totally ignore any comment from either D&J or Jasy from now

Bet you don't.

How much?

 

[Thermo]

what for ever and ever?