- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,444
- Reaction score
- 2,647
- Country
Praying on vulnerable desperate people and causing huge waste of NHS resources would be one view.
Praying on vulnerable desperate people and causing huge waste of NHS resources would be one view.
Well the medics clearly got that wrong, and he wasn't brain dead. It wasn't a miracle, it was an error in diagnosis with a lucky outcome for the boy.We need to remember miracles can happen, look at the boy who was declared brain dead, whose parents were about to switch off the machines and donate his organs back in March 2021, he woke up?! You just never know?
If they don't want another family to go through this again, then they should turn their attention to the viral challenges like this and the skull cracker which are causing kids brain damage or worse.Archie Battersbee family says ‘no parent must go through this again’
Relatives say they want changes to how life-support cases are dealt with after 12-year-old died following withdrawal of carewww.theguardian.com
The main thrust is: they think that the wrong decision was made and the law needs to be changed so that under the same circumstances they should get a different outcome and faster. They still think their child could have lived and every court and hospital said otherwise.
So could you tell us who you think ultimately has the control, or indeed should have control of your life/death or a family member's life/death?They still think their child could have lived and every court and hospital said otherwise.
Generally, the parents or legal guardian.So could you tell us who you think ultimately has the control, or indeed should have control of your life/death or a family member's life/death?
You or your family, the doctors, or the state?
You see it's an important issue, but some always try to separate certain issues when they are in fact connected...
Why can a court decide to remove life support, and yet refuse a person the right to die?
Whilst other countries have a different approach...
Are they right, or is the UK wrong?
Not at all...The parents want to remove the ability of the state to intervene.
Some parents actually want their children dead. Someone has to intervene where ever they can.I believe that the parents simply want the system not to be biased towards the state...
I guess we could go back and forth on this...Some parents actually want their children dead. Someone has to intervene where ever they can.
I thought you were all for anyone over the age of 60 being euthanised as a matter of course as soon as they were unable to eat soup without dribbling it? How old did you say you were?
The parents want to remove the ability of the state to intervene.