- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 18,123
- Reaction score
- 2,743
- Country
I would agree. Personally I would not be offering those with 60 years the same deal as those with 80+ years. But the more who pay in, the better the deal for everyone. So there is a need to balance. At this stage, he needs worse cases and votes.
It's quite clear that the freeholder is flogging the asset, because of the changes in the leasehold reform act and those threatened/promised by the new government. of course they could amount to nothing and the leaseholders are left with a 3rd party such as the one I mentioned. Profiteering.
Nothing stops the group making a counter offer, given the risk.
It's quite clear that the freeholder is flogging the asset, because of the changes in the leasehold reform act and those threatened/promised by the new government. of course they could amount to nothing and the leaseholders are left with a 3rd party such as the one I mentioned. Profiteering.
Nothing stops the group making a counter offer, given the risk.