Church Scandal gone global.

Noone has mentioned the pro's or the con's of the video link you gave, Al.

You would have got more interest if you would have put a vid up of a monkey. :D
 
Sponsored Links
One thing I find hilarious about bible, Koran, and any other god bothering types is their ability without any sense of IRONY or awareness to UPGRADE their beliefs.
If they TRULY believe their holy books then how can they change the original one?
NEW testament what did god say sorry the OLD one was just a draft?

Now they are saying they believe in EVOLUTION didn't say that when Darwin brought it out did they NOW its ok.

Science has the RIGHT to upgrade its theories RELIGION does NOT
because to do so alters the word of GOD who is INFALLIBLE?

To do so not only makes your god fallible but undermines your belief system
 
One thing I find hilarious about bible, Koran, and any other god bothering types is their ability without any sense of IRONY or awareness to UPGRADE their beliefs.
If they TRULY believe their holy books then how can they change the original one?
NEW testament what did god say sorry the OLD one was just a draft?

Now they are saying they believe in EVOLUTION didn't say that when Darwin brought it out did they NOW its ok.

Science has the RIGHT to upgrade its theories RELIGION does NOT
because to do so alters the word of GOD who is INFALLIBLE?

To do so not only makes your god fallible but undermines your belief system


You can interpret the scriptures a thousand different ways.

What a load of twaddle. :rolleyes:
 
You can interpret the scriptures a thousand different ways.

What a load of twaddle. :rolleyes:
You would have thought that knowing what we're like (after all he made us :confused: ), god would have spelt out one and only one book which couldn't be changed not open to various interpretations. Maybe the almighty one has limited abilities after all :idea:
 
Sponsored Links
The ancient scribes were never handed a definitive, preordained set of values written in several different languages for goodness sake.

I guess what those old wise men were trying to do was set out the ideal way to live your life as they saw it in ancient time.

Only a short sighted fool would expect the same words today.

But you have to admire the longevity of some of the scriptures.
 
again athiesm, only exists to defy god, they should thank god that god exists otherwise these athiests would not exist:cool:

and the reason no one has died in the name of athiesm, is because they say themselves they have no beliefs there fore they do not exist, but they do exist.....im getting confused.com..... much like the athiests, who cannot make up there minds, and keep twisting things.
 
The ancient scribes were never handed a definitive, preordained set of values written in several different languages for goodness sake.
I wish that this was a widely accepted viewpoint - we might avoid wars justified by "religious" expansion

I guess what those old wise men were trying to do was set out the ideal way to live your life as they saw it in ancient time.
agreed, but I would have thought that ethics and high moral standards remain timeless. Thus, with the god bits removed, the ten commandments is as true a set of reliable guidelines as it has always been and always will be

Only a short sighted fool would expect the same words today.
different words, but same meaning surely?
But you have to admire the longevity of some of the scriptures.
2 or 3 thousand years ain't that long in the grand plan of things. Trouble is, they don't tend to last even that long before someone wants to poo poo them and rewrite a new set of religious guidelines and claim to be the mouth of god.
 
and the reason no one has died in the name of athiesm, is because they say themselves they have no beliefs there fore they do not exist, but they do exist.....im getting confused.com..... much like the athiests, who cannot make up there minds, and keep twisting things.
Atheists have made up their mind though.

However, I suspect that the reason why noone is killed in the name of atheism is that unlike relgious sects, they don't have to cling onto the belief that their belief is the way to go and that anyone who doesn't accept this deserves to die. Thus the quoran refers to infidels having to be slaughtered, or words to that effect.
 
how do we know that no one has ever been killed in the name of athiesm?

where do we get our facts from.

Religious belief is the reason athiests exist....need i say more...they should thank god for there very existence.

what about all the murders and wars that happen how do we know that they were not athiests.......and the ones in the media that point the finger at muslims...again is like few grains of sand of the whole world histroy of wars and killings

sometimes I think i'm too smooth:cool:
 
dextrous";p="1560764 said:
=- they don't have to cling onto the belief that their belief is the way to go and that anyone who doesn't accept this deserves to die. Thus the quoran refers to infidels having to be slaughtered, or words to that effect.

the infidels mentioned in the quran are the ones that attack first and disrupt peace.....its not like muslims are commanded to kill people because they do not believe.

Skitz is the perfect example that his way is correct....and I am wrong and alwasy will be even though he cannnot give any plausable reason for athiesm, or that god doesnt exist......I am merely trying to find out from him facts...which he cannot prove,, and only trying because he is so stuck up that he is correct, and is trying to brainwash me again with no solid facts....being a materialst I would have thought he would have landed a few bricks on me :LOL:
 
how do we know that no one has ever been killed in the name of athiesm?

where do we get our facts from.

Religious belief is the reason athiests exist....need i say more...they should thank god for there very existence.

what about all the murders and wars that happen how do we know that they were not athiests.......and the ones in the media that point the finger at muslims...again is like few grains of sand of the whole world histroy of wars and killings

sometimes I think i'm too smooth:cool:

Killing in the name of atheism? Killing in the name of a disbelief?
I don't think you get how daft that is because you do not accept what atheism is.
We have to be clear on our definitions.

Theist - a god believer
Atheist - someone without a belief in god
Anti-theist - A type of atheist which believes in the non existence of gods and that religion is a bad thing.

Killing someone in the name of 'not believing in God' makes as much sense as killing in the name of 'not believing in Aliens'. There is no way to morally excuse it.
Whereas God believers can kill and 'know' it was what God commanded so therefore they were just doing his work and are guilt free.
 
sometimes I think i'm too smooth:cool:

I don't know about smooth but you do spout a lot of semi literate b****ox

You congratulate yourself for mindless drivel that makes no actual sense
I bet u became devout because of something bad that u did or your life went down the bog. I have many born agains so many were ex druggies , alkies or were involved in
Criminality
 
ive read the quran many times, and no where do I find reference we should kill infidels without reason or cause.:cool:

otherwise i'd be killing them innit:cool:
 
Religious belief is the reason athiests exist....need i say more...they should thank god for there very existence.
So, by the same logic, people exist to satisfy the needs of murderers. Children exist because paedophiles exist. Women exist because rapists exist. :confused:

Cart before the horse dear boy, cart before the horse.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top