Then you can't be doing heavy enough stuff! In fact until about 3 years ago I might possibly have agreed with you. Then I got involved with several large, heavy refurbs on listed buildings and my opinion changed. Sure, you can cut down a 6 metre long 10 x 2in softwood joist to 8 x 2in with a TS55 and a guide rail - but if you have 30 or 40 of them it's a considerably faster (and arguably a heck of a lot more accurate) to do the job on a table saw. Sure you can make-up repeat 50mm rips of 12mm plywood with a rail saw, but again it's faster (and arguably a heck of a lot more accurate) to do the job on a table saw once you've done the initial breaking down on with a rail saw.Personally I don't see any use for table saws on site. I can do everything they do and more with my rail saws.
You don't see the Powermatic because until relatively recently they didn't come anywhere close to meeting European safety standards (e.g. no riving knife, inadequate guarding, no brake, etc - they still have no braking AFAIK) as well as being ridiculously expensive (when imported) for what they are (I don't think they hod a candle to the Wadkin AGS of yore or the Sedgwicks of today). I wouldn't hold your breath for safety standards being dropped to the appallingly low American standards, either - in part because we in the UK were one of the main instigators of the current woodworking machinery standards and regulations, along with the Germans and the Swiss (SUVA). So the braking and safety requirements simply aren't going to disappear. In any case the long arbors really started to disappear after the 1974 regs came into force (yes, that long ago) - something I'd have expected a trained woodworker to both know and understand.Aside from the safety gimmekry it looks like a quality piece of equipment.
Similar to the Powermatic machines. That you never see here.
Mebbe now that were leaving the eu we will get those big dado arboured machines released to the diy masses?
Sure you can make-up repeat 50mm rips of 12mm plywood with a rail saw, but again it's faster (and arguably a heck of a lot more accurate) to do the job on a table saw once you've done the initial breaking down on with a rail saw.
In any case the long arbors really started to disappear after the 1974 regs came into force
Really? Often no FLT on a site and as most plunge/rail saw users are aware thin strips are awkward and error prone on guide rail saws. Stacking isn't really an option when you are using-up offcuts, etc either. BTW I was specifically referring to site environmentI do hundreds of those with my 270mm Makita circular saw and fence guide straight from a full stack of ply. Only lifting is done with the forklift.
Far faster and more accurate than a table saw or rail saw. One man operation.
Plus I can slice about 6 or 7 sheets at once.
So what? You won't find them on many saws available in the EU, and quoting a £3k Felder really doesn't help your case one jot - I've yet to see a joiner or contractor turn up with one of them on site! I have taught wood machining in the past, so I do know the regs passably well (and note: unlike a lot of people I didn't say that dado heads are illegal) and also what manufacturers have done to ensure that they carry minimal liabilityThe long arbours are still available. Have one in my felder machne.
Really?
Funny. I thought you were saying that you could and would do that with a rail sawRoger928 said:Personally I don't see any use for table saws on site. I can do everything they do and more with my rail saws.
do that
I do hundreds of those with my 270mm Makita circular saw and fence guide straight from a full stack of ply.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local