Concentration camps

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why are no pyres visible on aerial photos of Treblinka?

"Any doubts about the existence of mass graves at the Treblinka death camp in Poland are being laid to rest by the first survey of the site using tools that see below the ground, writes forensic archaeologist Caroline Sturdy Colls."

"They also discovered human remains as they dug into the ground, and on the surface "large quantities of ashes mixed with sand, among which are numerous human bones".


"Aerial photography from the 1940s can now be supplemented with satellite imagery, GPS and mapping software."


Ground-penetrating radar (above) - sends pulses of radar into the earth and records the reflections
Resistance survey - electric current passed through the ground via probes, with solid features exhibiting higher resistance than water-rich ones
Electrical imaging - like resistance survey, but with multiple (eg 20) probes

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16657363



Richard Krege is an Australian engineer who claims to have carried out Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) or electromagnetic scanning in October 1999 of soil layers at the sites of the Treblinka extermination camp, and the Belzec camp.

He claimed the subsurface soil layers in both locations did not show the pattern of disturbances that would be expected if mass graves holding up to a million bodies existed, according to the standard historical view[citation needed]. He does however admit there is a grave visible on WW2 aerial photos of Treblinka that could hold up to 10,000 in an area he didn't scan. The estimated number of exterminated at Treblinka alone is up to one million, meaning his findings are considered incorrect by historians and unsupported.

Krege maintains that he took a team of scientists to Treblinka in October 1999. However according to British historian Alan Heath, Krege did not have permission from the authorities in Warsaw, Siedlce nor in Treblinka itself[citation needed]. This led this historian to assume that Krege either never visited Treblinka at all or was at the site only for a very short time for a video of the scanning to be taken. This opinion is further supported by the fact that Fredrick Töben, director of the Adelaide Institute which funded Krege's team, did not present the findings at the Iranian Holocaust Conference which he attended in December 2006.

Krege has not only failed to publish his findings but also has failed to respond to questions as to the actual dates of his alleged visits to Treblinka and Bełżec nor challenges to visit the site with qualified scientists.

To avoid arrest in the European Union, Krege used his brothers Passport to travel by air to London and then overland to the Ukraine in July 2009.

http://www.antisemitism.org.il/eng/Richard Krege

:rolleyes:
 
Sponsored Links
What did the crematoria use for fuel?

The synthetic fuel was made from coal, yeah?

Coal burns, yeah?

The bodies were cremated on large pyres, yeah?

SO JUST BURN THE BLOODY COAL THEN,

FFS you will grasp any straw to keep your nonsensical claim going. :rolleyes:

Yes they did also burn them in large pits when they gassed more than the crem could handle.

So you saying fuel can't be use in a pit? Is this the basis for your argument?
:LOL: :LOL: :LOL:

Are you saying that coal can't? Is that your rebuttal? :rolleyes:

Not at all, I'm pointing out that fuel was available at the camp and as you have pointed out, the fuel was synthesised from coal. In other words, they had plenty of fuel available to do the job..

BTW the pits are a myth. No magnetic resonance has ever been found there - yet we can find fire sites from the bronze age. ;)

Give up mate - you've lost this one. :mrgreen:

Is that so? Well we have gone down that road also. He is just like you, when peers wanted to scrutinise his findings he went silent, in other words, he was unable to support his claim, didn't hold water

:mrgreen:

:rolleyes:
 
What does that prove? :rolleyes:

That people get chased around the world for making tests that don't agree with you? But when a Jewish girl goes to do the tests it's all hunky dory because she'd made her mind up before she got there.

How far did she dig down?

Did she check for magnetic anomalies? (fire)

Did she fook. :rolleyes:
 
The Germans ran there tanks on gasoline so why didnt they use their own engines to produce co


If you would care to read the information posted you will have found your answer. They did use their own, there was only one diesel engine used because of the availability of them in that area...
depending on what source you read it was either a German Uboat engine or a Russian tank engine , at the end of the day if you want to kill people more efficiently you would use a gasoline engine not a diesel engine so please spare me the nonsense about graphs, statistics, ect. about the viability of using diesel fumes for mass extermination, the orthodox definition of the Holocaust is that it began in 1933 so one would expect by 1943 the Nazis would have come up with something more Germanic than a second hand Russian Tank engine and bug spray, i would like to believe in the Holocaust because it makes one feel good to know there are people out there worse than yourself however anything i have read on this thread just confirms that the evidence just isn't there sorry.
 
Sponsored Links
The Germans ran there tanks on gasoline so why didnt they use their own engines to produce co


If you would care to read the information posted you will have found your answer. They did use their own, there was only one diesel engine used because of the availability of them in that area...
depending on what source you read it was either a German Uboat engine or a Russian tank engine , at the end of the day if you want to kill people more efficiently you would use a gasoline engine not a diesel engine so please spare me the nonsense about graphs, statistics, ect. about the viability of using diesel fumes for mass extermination, the orthodox definition of the Holocaust is that it began in 1933 so one would expect by 1943 the Nazis would have come up with something more Germanic than a second hand Russian Tank engine and bug spray, i would like to believe in the Holocaust because it makes one feel good to know there are people out there worse than yourself however anything i have read on this thread just confirms that the evidence just isn't there sorry.



"During the first experiments and the first set of transports in the second series of experiments bottled gas was still used for gassing; however, for the last transports of the second series of experiments the Jews were killed with the exhaust gases from a tank or lorry engine which was operated by Hackenholt."

SS-Untersturmführer Oberhauser on the death camp at Belzec

http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/o/

All three of the Reinhard camps used carbon monoxide, pumped into sealed rooms, to do their killing.

Carbon monoxide worked slower than Zyklon B, but it worked well enough for Himmler to proceed. While he was ... in Lublin, he sent a written order to Krüger: the "resettlement" of the entire Jewish population of the Government General was to be completed by December 31, 1942. With the exception of a few collection camps for Jews in some major cities, no Jews were to remain in Poland. All Jewish laborers had to complete their jobs or be transferred to one of the collection camps. These measures were prerequisites for the Nazi "new order" in Europe, since any remaining Jews would stimulate resistance and provide a source of moral and physical pestilence. (Himmler to Krüger, 19 July 1942, NA RG 238, NO-5574, quoted by Arad, Belzec, 47)(Breitman, 238)

Those who deny the Holocaust have claimed that fumes from a diesel engine are not toxic enough to kill people. (This claim is made with regard to the death camp of Treblinka - see Section 4.1.3 for the rulings from the German Treblinka trials. In other death camps, gasoline engines were used. The method of killing was simple - people were crammed into the gas chambers, and the exhaust of powerful engines was pumped into them).

In a closed chamber, of course diesel fumes will kill. There was actually a study on this in the British Journal of Industrial Medicine (Prattle, 47-55.) The researchers ran a few experiments in which various animals were exposed to diesel fumes, and studied the results.

In the experiments, the exhaust of a small diesel engine (568 cc, 6 BHP) was connected to a chamber 10 cubic meters (340 cubic feet) in volume, and the animals were put inside it. In all cases, the animals died. Death was swifter when the intake of air to the engine was restricted, as this causes a large increase in the amount of carbon monoxide (CO) that is emitted. (See, for instance, Diesel Engine Reference Book, by Lilly, 1985, p. 18/8, where it is stated that at a high air/fuel ratio the concentration of CO is only a few parts per million but for lower ratios (25:1) the concentration of CO can rise up to 3,000 ppm. It is very easy to restrict the air intake - the British researchers did so by partially covering the air intake opening with a piece of metal.)

Even in cases where the CO output was low, the animals still died from other toxic components - mainly, irritants and nitrogen dioxide.

Now, the diesel engines used in Treblinka were much larger - they belonged to captured Soviet T-34 tanks. These tanks weighed 26-31 tons (depending on the model) and had a 500 BHP engine (compared to a mere 6 BHP in the British experiments). The volume of the extermination chambers in Treblinka is, of course, a factor. But the chambers' volume is about 60 cubic meters (2040 cubic feet); this is 6 times more than those in the British experiments, but the difference in the size of the engines is much larger than a factor of 6.

It should be remembered that what matters in CO poisoning is not the concentration of CO, but the ratio of CO to oxygen. In a small, gas-tight room, crammed full of people, oxygen levels drop quickly, thus making death by CO poisoning faster. As noted, other toxic components in the fumes further accelerate mortality.

The SS was aware of the fact that cramming as many people as possible into the gas chamber, thus leaving no empty spaces, would accelerate mortality. This is evident, for instance, from a letter regarding "gassing vans" (used in the Chelmno extermination camp and other locations) sent to SS-Obersturmbannführer Walter Rauff, 5 June 1942. (Rauff was in charge of the Technical Department of the Reich Security Main Office, and was responsible for developing the mobile gas vans used by the Einsatzgruppen) The letter is quite long, but here is the relevant part:

2) The vans are normally loaded with 9-10 people per square meter. With the large Saurer special vans this is not possible because although they do not become overloaded their maneuverability is much impaired. A reduction in the load area appears desirable. It can be achieved by reducing the size of the van by c. 1 meter. The difficulty referred to cannot be overcome by reducing the size of the load. For a reduction in the numbers will necessitate a longer period of operation because the free spaces will have to be filled with CO. By contrast, a smaller load area which is completely full requires a much shorter period of operation since there are no free spaces. (Just. Get pub/people/r/rauff.walter/rauff.letter.060542)

On July 22 ...deportations began from the Warsaw ghetto to ... [ Treblinka]. The same day, Globocnik wrote to Karl Wolff: "The Reich Führer SS ... has given us so much new work that with it now all our most secret wishes are to be fulfilled. I am so very thankful to him for this, and he can be sure of one thing, that these things he wishes will be fulfilled in the shortest time." (On the start of deportations to Treblinka, Arad, Belzec, 60-61, 392. Quote from Globocnik to Wolff, 22 July 1942, Globocnik SS file, Berlin Document Center.) (Breitman, 238)

The Treblinka site is now a Polish National Monument.

http://www.nizkor.org/faqs/reinhard/reinhard-faq-07.html

interesting read.
 
The Germans ran there tanks on gasoline so why didnt they use their own engines to produce co


If you would care to read the information posted you will have found your answer. They did use their own, there was only one diesel engine used because of the availability of them in that area...
depending on what source you read it was either a German Uboat engine or a Russian tank engine , at the end of the day if you want to kill people more efficiently you would use a gasoline engine not a diesel engine so please spare me the nonsense about graphs, statistics, ect. about the viability of using diesel fumes for mass extermination, the orthodox definition of the Holocaust is that it began in 1933 so one would expect by 1943 the Nazis would have come up with something more Germanic than a second hand Russian Tank engine and bug spray, i would like to believe in the Holocaust because it makes one feel good to know there are people out there worse than yourself however anything i have read on this thread just confirms that the evidence just isn't there sorry.

I tend to stick with the version backed up with SS documents etc
 
If Auschwitz was a death camp why did it have a hospital for the inmates? ;)

As in the camp only those who worked had the right to live, therefore the sick were taken regularly from the hospital at

p.77

intervals of time, and murdered. Such activities were called selections. This nightmare weighed heavily upon the hospital huts. It obviously deterred the sick people, so that for a long period of time the hospitals of Auschwitz were a refuge only for would-be-suicides, tired of life and the torments of camp existence. Such selections were also carried on in the housing blocks of all sections and branches of the camp, in order to clear out prisoners from them unfit for further work. In most cases the SSdoctors Helmersohn, Thilo, König, Mengele and Kitt, whith the manager of the Prisoners’ Employment department reviewed the sick and the prisoners in the blocks and without any medical inspection they decided merely from ,the appearance of the prisoner whether he should live or die. The prisoner, who at the first glance gave the impression of being exhausted, sick, unable to work, was regarded by the doctor as qualified for destruction. The sick knew that they were approaching in turn these masters of their life and death and tried to give the impression of being healthy. They straightened themselves, lifted their heads, pushed out their lean chests, trying in this way to weight the scales in favour of life. It did not help much, it was sometimes enough that someone had an abcess, or wore a a bandage, and so fell victim to selection. The Viennese Paul Kruger, was selected only because as he had an old appendicitis scar. The methods of selection are proved by the fact that in about 20 minutes the doctor "inspected" in this way often about 500 persons. During a certain selection carried out by Helmersohn, the physically weak prisoners tried to conceal themselves under the plank beds. They were seen and the SS-men fired blindly at the hidden men, wounding and killing many of them. The extent of destruction by such a selection is proved by the fact based on statistical data, that 7,616 people were selected only from the camp of the quarantine in Birkenau during the period from August 29 th 1943 up to Oct. 29 th 1944.

http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/gcpol11.htm

http://www.fold3.com/page/285875667_nazi_medicine_and_nazi_doctors/

http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/marcuse/classes/33d/projects/medicine/Medicine.htm

nice places :rolleyes:
You just posted a load a crap mate, were do you get this stuff from then?was any one ever prosecuted for the alleged atrocities, do we have autopsy reports, time and cause of death ect. or is it another "eye witness" account, it sounds just like the script from another holocaust movie, same old , same old, Diabolical Nazi and poor Jewish victim, you should realise that Holofatigue is starting set in amongst the public, we can only take so many Guard dogs with poison teeth, camp commandants who feed a jew to their pet bear for breakfast every morning,ss guards who shoot women if their breasts are big enough to grope , people want facts mate.
 
You just posted a load a crap mate, were do you get this stuff from then?was any one ever prosecuted for the alleged atrocities, do we have autopsy reports, time and cause of death ect. or is it another "eye witness" account, it sounds just like the script from another holocaust movie, same old , same old, Diabolical Nazi and poor Jewish victim, you should realise that Holofatigue is starting set in amongst the public, we can only take so many Guard dogs with poison teeth, camp commandants who feed a jew to their pet bear for breakfast every morning,ss guards who shoot women if their breasts are big enough to grope , people want facts mate.

What a peculiarly vivid imagination you seem to have.
 
You just posted a load a crap mate, were do you get this stuff from then?was any one ever prosecuted for the alleged atrocities, do we have autopsy reports, time and cause of death ect. or is it another "eye witness" account, it sounds just like the script from another holocaust movie, same old , same old, Diabolical Nazi and poor Jewish victim, you should realise that Holofatigue is starting set in amongst the public, we can only take so many Guard dogs with poison teeth, camp commandants who feed a jew to their pet bear for breakfast every morning,ss guards who shoot women if their breasts are big enough to grope , people want facts mate.

Summary

The Medical Case, U.S.A. vs. Karl Brandt, et al. (also known as the Doctors' Trial), was prosecuted in 1946-47 against twenty-three doctors and administrators accused of organizing and participating in war crimes and crimes against humanity in the form of medical experiments and medical procedures inflicted on prisoners and civilians.

Karl Brandt, the lead defendant, was the senior medical official of the German government during World War II; other defendants included senior doctors and administrators in the armed forces and SS. They were indicted on four counts: 1. conspiracy to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity; 2. war crimes (i.e., crimes against persons protected by the laws of war, such as prisoners of war); 3. crimes against humanity (including persons not protected by the laws of war); and 4. membership in a criminal organization (the SS).

The specific crimes charged included more than twelve series of medical experiments concerning the effects of and treatments for high altitude conditions, freezing, malaria, poison gas, sulfanilamide, bone, muscle, and nerve regeneration, bone transplantation, saltwater consumption, epidemic jaundice, sterilization, typhus, poisons, and incendiary bombs.

These experiments were conducted on concentration camp inmates. Other crimes involved the killing of Jews for anatomical research, the killing of tubercular Poles, and the euthanasia of sick and disabled civilians in Germany and occupied territories. The defendants were charged with ordering, supervising, or coordinating criminal activities, as well as participating in them directly. The fourth count concerned membership in the SS (Schuttzstaffeln) of the Nazi regime.

Karl Brandt and six other defendants were convicted, sentenced to death, and executed; nine defendants were convicted and sentenced to terms in prison; and seven defendants were acquitted.

The material presented in this project includes case file documents (the briefs and document books created and used in the course of the trial), evidence file documents (the evidentiary documents from which the prosecution, and occasionally the defendants, derived their exhibits), and the trial transcript.

The trial documents and evidence file documents related to Case 1 amount to approximately 2800 documents and 13,000 pages of material.

http://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/php/docs_swi.php?DI=1&text=medical

:rolleyes:
 
Nuremberg Code

The Nuremberg Code (hereafter the Code) was the first modern effort by the international community to create guidelines governing research on humans. The goal of the Code is to protect the rights of subjects and to prevent the “horrendous non-therapeutic, non-consensual” medical experiments conducted by Nazi researchers during World War II from recurring.30 The Code states that in medical experiments involving human subjects, “voluntary consent of the human subject is essential.” The individual must be able to “exercise the free power of choice” and must have sufficient knowledge of the nature of the experiment to make an “enlightened decision.”31 The subject should be informed of the “nature, duration, and purpose…the methods and means, all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected…and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from this participation in the experiment.”32

The Code’s significance as the document that symbolizes the beginning of the systematic ethical treatment of human subjects in clinical trials is without question. Taken as a whole, however, the Code is a simple document that is ill-equipped to regulate the changing landscape of clinical trials. Chief among the Code’s limitations is that the obligation to follow its precepts falls only on the researcher. The Code does not address the conduct of organizations that sponsor clinical trials. Further, it does not contain criteria to evaluate the quality of consent, nor does it provide specific measures of enforcement to assure adherence to its requirements.33 In addition, neither the United Nations nor the United States recognizes the Code as a binding legal document. In fact, in the United States, no court has ever awarded an injured individual damages solely for violation of the Nuremberg Code.34

In the context of the Trovan clinical trial, an argument could be made, as the plaintiffs’ did, that Pfizer’s conduct violated the Nuremberg Code to the extent that its doctors did not obtain informed consent from the participants. Would the United States legal system recognize, however, violations on international law that are contained in a document it never adopted?
 
How many died? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
If you consider it to be a farce why are you asking?

If you hadn't been so blinded in your rush to denigrate people you would have seen you falsely maligned one of the witnesses whose evidence you seem happy to rely on.

So go do some proper research and when you have a more considered opinion than "what a load of bolox" with regard to such a tragic loss of life perhaps you'll be happy to post it.

Little tip though.
Don't ask your mates Cole, Weber and Leuchter, they made you look a complete twt.
 
How many died? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
If you consider it to be a farce why are you asking?

If you hadn't been so blinded in your rush to denigrate people you would have seen you falsely maligned one of the witnesses whose evidence you seem happy to rely on.

So go do some proper research and when you have a more considered opinion than "what a load of bolox" with regard to such a tragic loss of life perhaps you'll be happy to post it.

Little tip though.
Don't ask your mates Cole, Weber and Leuchter, they made you look a complete twt.

So you can't tell? And what have I told you about attacking the postman?

It matters not whether it is David Cole or Tinky Winky that asks the questions - it's the ANSWER that matters.

Now tell me how many died, (he can't)
:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top