Congestion - ?

[twm.bwen]

Take that back, whack the money into public transport, but you get my point.

 

[markie]

Some how I can't see 2 jags peddling to number 10, or even getting the bus

 

[jonnyfishing]

What is a farce is that some people believe what's printed in The Sun.

The Department of Transport advice is revealed in this week’s Auto Car magazine.

 

[Softus]

Just my tuppence worth...cue the abuse?

Marvellous post. Respect.

 

[jonnyfishing]

Councils told : “ Jam up traffic “
Councils are being told to deliberately create traffic jams—then bring in road tolls to “ease” them.

Yet another thing this daft Government is getting drastically wrong. The general population will see through them at some point though ... I hope

Don't hold your breath esra.......

 

[Softus]

Yet another thing this daft Government is getting drastically wrong. The general population will see through them at some point though ... I hope

I'm sure you're right, and at the next General Election people will sit at home in their droves.

 

[jonnyfishing]

Yet another thing this daft Government is getting drastically wrong. The general population will see through them at some point though ... I hope

I'm sure you're right, and at the next General Election people will sit at home in their droves.

I agree, unless they open their eyes, one way or another.

 

[joe-90]

If the congestion is so bad - why are we bringing in all the immigrants? More people = more cars.

We don't need MORE people - we need LESS.

 

[jonnyfishing]

Don't think many people will disagree with that Joe.

 

[Softus]

If the congestion is so bad - why are we bringing in all the immigrants?

That's a nonsensical argument.

Congestion has increased out of all proportion to population growth. If you have sufficient intelligence then this will be obvious to you, so no figures are necessary.

More people = more cars.

Er, no. More people = more people.
More people travelling + more expensive public transport = more cars.

We don't need MORE people - we need LESS.

Do you mean fewer? If so then you're wrong. If you have sufficient intelligence then this will be obvious to you, so no figures are necessary.

 

[jonnyfishing]

Don't think many people will disagree with that Joe.

With the exception of Softus....if that figures !!

 

[joe-90]

If the congestion is so bad - why are we bringing in all the immigrants?

That's a nonsensical argument.

Congestion has increased out of all proportion to population growth. If you have sufficient intelligence then this will be obvious to you, so no figures are necessary.

More people = more cars.

Er, no. More people = more people.
More people travelling + more expensive public transport = more cars.

We don't need MORE people - we need LESS.

Do you mean fewer? If so then you're wrong. If you have sufficient intelligence then this will be obvious to you, so no figures are necessary.

I mean LESS as an opposite to MORE.

You enjoy your alternative reality, Softus.

 

[Softus]

I mean LESS as an opposite to MORE.

The opposite of "more people" is "fewer people", not that using the correct words would add any weight to your fatuous and flawed reasoning.

 

[joe-90]

I mean LESS as an opposite to MORE.

The opposite of "more people" is "fewer people", not that using the correct words would add any weight to your fatuous and flawed reasoning.

The opposite of more is less.

And the argument is sound anyway.


BTW, where were your maternal and paternal grandparents born?

 

[Softus]

The opposite of more is less.

You have a poor understanding of English grammar, even when the answer has been delivered to you on a plate.

And the argument is sound anyway.

BTW, where were your maternal and paternal grandparents born?

I'm delighted to be able to confirm that this information is both irrelevant to the issue of immigration and, also, absolutely none of your business.