Look at the ONS figures, that is based on primary causeSo basically you could be tested for Covid, receive a positive result and then get run over by a bus and STILL be classed as a 'covid' death. On the other hand, my daughters boyfriends grandad died, aged 103 - he was in general poor health, heart and lungs. He was tested twice for Covid while in hospital, both times were negative yet he still had ‘Covid related illness' mentioned on his death certificate. Obviously, he would have been counted as a Covid death. I wonder how many times that situation was duplicated?
We need to know the numbers of who died due to Covid, not who died with or after having Covid.
Nope. The R value measures how fast it's growing, not how many cases there are. Like speed and acceleration.If - just saying - if there are actually twice as many cases than are known about, does that mean the R rate is half what they think it is?
We need to know the numbers of who died due to Covid, not who died with or after having Covid.
No. It doesn't.Yes, growing from the supposed base.
If that base is twice as many as thought then the 'R'einfection rate is halved.
Yes, growing from the supposed base.
If that base is twice as many as thought then the 'R'einfection rate is halved.
Malta, Cyprus, Lithuania, Denmark, Iceland.John, out of interest. What European country has carried more tests per head than us?
People like him only concentrate on the negative.
John, out of interest. What European country has carried more tests per head than us?